ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday asked the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to prove Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PMLN) supremo and former prime minister Nawaz Sharif’s link with the London flats and offshore companies, and that these properties were bought in 1993.
A two-member bench comprising Justice Farooq and Judge Mohsin Akhtar Kayani heard the appeals of Maryam and Captain (retd) Safdar against their conviction in the Avenfield property reference. Justice Aamir Farooq Tuesday remarked that the proceedings of the hearing on PMLN Vice President Maryam Nawaz’s appeal against the sentence in the Avenfield Apartments reference “cannot move further on the basis of assumptions”.
“National Accountability Bureau (NAB) should prove through evidence that these properties were acquired by [former prime minister] Nawaz Sharif in 1990s,” he said during the hearing. The bench inquired about the nexus between the two offshore companies and Nawaz, through documentary evidence, urging the NAB counsel to explain how Maryam “aided and abetted” her father in acquiring properties in London in 1993 or 2006 when the trust deed was signed.
To support his arguments, NAB special prosecutor Usman Cheema read the court’s decision declaring Nawaz an offender, and in response to that, Justice Farooq clarified that Nawaz’s appeal was dismissed because of his absenteeism and not on the basis of merit.
Justice Farooq told the NAB prosecutors that the Bureau was heading towards a blind alley. Justice Farooq also made it clear that any Supreme Court observation in the Panamagate judgment was not relevant to the decision regarding Maryam Nawaz’s appeal against her conviction.
He said the NAB has to prove whether the prosecution proved the case against Maryam before the accountability court. “We have to see how she helped acquire these properties,” Justice Farooq said, asking the NAB counsel how the apartments were acquired in 1993.
The prosecutor claimed that Maryam “aided, abetted and assisted” her father in acquiring the properties in 2006. The judge asked: “You said that Nawaz bought the properties in 1993, then how did she assist him in 2006?”
Justice Kayani observed that Maryam has not said on any occasion that the property belonged to her, or that she owned it. “Minus the trust deed and Calibri font issue, and move on to the actual case regarding the properties acquired in 1993,” he added. He said that it was “basic criminal law” that the prosecution must establish its case using evidence even if the accused has admitted to committing the crime.
The judge inquired what evidence the prosecution had to prove the case against Nawaz. “The prosecution has to establish the case beyond a reasonable doubt,” he said. “Who made the payment to acquire the properties in 1993?” the IHC judge asked, adding that “NAB has to prove that the payment to acquire these properties came from Nawaz.”
The NAB prosecutor said that NAB would take up the matter of preparing trust deed in 2006, at which the court remarked that then Maryam Nawaz had no role in 1993. Maryam’s counsel Amjad Pervaiz said that Nelson and Nescom had purchased these apartments in 1993, 1995 and 1996. He said that Nawaz Sharif had never admitted the ownership of this property.
The prosecutor said that the decision of the accountability court was maintained to the extent of Nawaz Sharif. He said Nawaz Sharif and his children were living in these apartments.
The former prime minister had taken a clear stance before the top court, he said. Justice Farooq said that the burden of proof couldn’t be shifted on the basis of public knowledge. He asked the NAB to present the title documents of Nelson and Nescom to the court.
Justice Farooq said that the court couldn’t raise its questions in more easy way than this. The NAB requested the court to adjourn the hearing that the court accepted and the case will be heard on September 29.
