close
Wednesday November 27, 2024

Allotment of plots SC questions discretionary powers of PM

By Sohail Khan
April 15, 2022
The Supreme Court of Pakistan. Photo: SC website
The Supreme Court of Pakistan. Photo: SC website

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court, while questioning the discretionary powers of the prime minister to allot two plots to government officials, has observed that there is no principle involved, as the haves are facilitated while the have-nots are neglected.

This was observed by a two-member bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Qazi Faez Isa, on Thursday while hearing the case of the Federal Government Employees Housing Foundation on allotment of plots.

The court dismissed the appeal of appellant Muhammad Siddique and upheld cancellation of allotment of the second plot. During the hearing, Justice Qazi Faez Isa observed that the prime minister, while exercising his discretionary powers, had allotted two plots, adding that there is no principle for allotment of plots in the country as we read in newspapers about allotment of two plots to federal secretaries.

The judge observed that in our country only the big guns managed to get plots but nobody allots plots to the poor. Justice Isa questioned if the secretaries and generals don’t draw salaries.

"Go to the slums and witness the living standard of the poor having small rooms," Justice Isa remarked. The judge further observed that although the country's name was Islami Jamhuria Pakistan, nothing was being done here in accordance with Islam.

To a court query, the counsel for the Federal Government Employees Housing Foundation submitted that the policy of allotment had been abolished, adding that earlier two plots were allotted to bureaucrats and other officials of state institutions.

The counsel further said after 2006, nobody had got two plots. The counsel for appellant Muhammad Siddique pleaded the court to set aside the decision of cancellation of the second plot because his client had constructed a house on the plot, which was being taken over now. The court, however, rejected the plea of the counsel.