Rabbani says Article 63A does not deprive MP of voting right
ISLAMABAD: Former Chairman Senate Mian Raza Rabbani said, “with mala fide intent, the government is creating misunderstanding on the interpretation of Article 63A of Constitution, 1973 as the provisions of disqualification under Article 63A will become effective once if a member leaves a Parliamentary Party and/or exercises his right to vote against the party whip.”
“Article 63A, Constitution, 1973, cannot be used to deprive a member of voting in whatsoever manner that he desires,” he said while giving his views on the issue of 63-A.
Raza Rabbani, who articulated the 18th Amendment in the Constitution, said the Speaker/ Presiding Officer has no powers, under the Constitution, and/ or Rules of Business of the National Assembly, to stop a member from exercising his right to vote.
On the contrary, he said, the Speaker must provide an atmosphere within the precincts and the House in which a member can perform his parliamentary duties including the right to vote, in a safe and transparent atmosphere.
Rabbani said the intent of Article 63A, Constitution, 1973, is to forewarn a member that if he leaves a Parliamentary Party and/or votes against the party whip, as a consequence of such act, he can be disqualified, should a member, in full knowledge of the provisions of Article 63A, 1973, still wants to exercise his right to vote according to his conscience and subsequently, is to bear the consequences, if any, under the rules, law and the Constitution, he cannot be prevented from doing so.
He said it is, thus, abundantly clear that the provisions of Article 63A, Constitution, 1973, are not a bar nor, in any way, prevent a member from casting his vote.
He said such an interpretation of Article 63A, Constitution, 1973, and also the fact that Speaker National Assembly is looking for ways and means to scuttle the Vote of No Confidence, prove the fact that the Prime Minister no longer commands the majority of the members of the National Assembly.
The former Chairman Senate said such a move of scuttling the No Confidence Motion without it being put to the vote, will be unconstitutional. “Any such person shall be circumventing and subverting the Constitution, 1973,” he said.
-
Savannah Guthrie Expresses Fresh Hope As Person Detained For Questioning Over Kidnapping Of Nancy -
ByteDance Suspends Viral Seedance 2.0 Photo-to-voice Feature: Here’s Why -
Tom Hanks Diabetes 2 Management Strategy Laid Bare -
Bad Bunny Wins Hearts With Sweet Gesture At Super Bowl Halftime Show -
Why Angelina Jolie Loves Her 'scars' Following Double Mastectomy -
‘World Is In Peril’: Anthropic AI Safety Researcher Resigns, Warns Of Global Risks -
Meghan Markle Receives Apology As Andrew Puts Monarchy In Much Bigger Scandal -
Catherine O’Hara Becomes Beacon Of Hope For Rectal Cancer Patients -
Nancy Guthrie: Is She Alive? Former FBI Director Shares Possibilities On 10th Day Of Kidnapping -
Siemens Energy Profit Surges Nearly Threefold Amid AI Boom For Gas Turbines, Grids -
TikTok's ByteDance To Develop Advance AI Chips With Samsung -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie In Dilemma As Andrew, Fergie Scandal Continues -
Tumbler Ridge School Shooting Among Canada’s Deadliest — Here’s Where It Ranks -
Suspect Detained As Authorities Probe Nancy Guthrie’s Abduction -
Tumbler Ridge Tragedy: Nine Killed, 25 Injured After School Shooting In British Columbia -
FDA Sends 'refusal-to-file' To Moderna Over New Flu Vaccine