troops to cordon off that area to deny the possibility of exit to Baitullah Mahsud. There is every possibility for him to quietly slip out of the operational zone. However, now that the government has started military operations we are left with no choice but to hope that it would succeed in the declared objective, though the past record says otherwise.
The government needs to establish its credibility by providing protection to the people against the militants. It has to prove its claim of being serious in eliminating militants only then will its image and credibility be restored. Short of that, nothing will convince the locals who are at the receiving end of violence. They will not buy the lamentable argument that the militants have fled to the mountains or crossed the borders into another country. The government had not properly addressed grievances of the tribesmen in the past, nor taken them into confidence in policymaking decisions concerning their area. Now empty words will not do. They will not restore the confidence of the people. The government has to match words with deeds, and only then will the long suffering people take the government seriously.
It is an established fact that Azad Kashmir was added into the map of Pakistan only with the sacrifices of the forefathers of the affected areas. They guarded our western borders for decades after independence and played an important role in the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan. In return for these services their reward was more poverty and backwardness. Today, after 61 years of independence, we do not see any sign of economic development in the area nor any industry installed anywhere in FATA which could provide employment opportunity to its luckless people.
The tribesmen alone cannot be blamed for creating a situation in which they find themselves now. There are other and more important elements responsible for what is happening there. Isn't it a fact that it was the tribal areas of Pakistan from where the biggest covert war in history war launched against the Soviet Union? Isn't it ironic that the territory from where the last battle of the cold war was fought and won for the west, due to no fault of its inhabitants, was to become a "haven" for the terrorists and a "target" of the American drones?
Worst still, the "war on terror" was brought from across the border to their area. The collateral damage that they suffered in the eight years war is unparalleled in the history of the country. Neither Islamabad and Washington did anything for the welfare of the people nor developed the area. The only favour that they did to the people was the gifts of death and destruction, through the drones.
(To be continued)
The writer is a former ambassador. Email: waziruk@hotmail.com
This demand has fueled rapid growth deposit base of Islamic Banks and Islamic Windows operated by conventional banks
But Punjab Agriculture Food and Drug Authority building near Thokar Niazbeg on Multan Road stands out
Macron has been particularly vocal in their criticism, asserting that withholding arms from Kyiv plays directly into...
As PPP governs province, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari holds strategic position to address both violence and its underlying...
Critics argue that strategy is vague, but closer look indicates strategic alignment with global trends and national...
To defeat it, we must distrust bot-driven narratives, to defeat it, we must verify sources before believing or sharing