Modi’s Kashmir statehood assurance ‘vague’: Qureshi
By News Desk
ISLAMABAD: Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi on Friday said as Kashmiris want the full-fledged restoration of occupied Jammu and Kashmir’s statehood, the claim of Indian prime minister Narendra Modi to fulfill such a demand “at some opportune time” was entirely “vague and against the interest of Kashmiris”.
He termed the meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Kashmiri leaders while leaving out the All Parties Hurriyat Conference a “staged drama and a public relations exercise” to cover up the illegal acts of August 5, 2019. “This was a failed attempt on part of the Indian prime minister to mend the tarnished image of his government following the illegal acts of revocation of special status of Jammu and Kashmir,” the foreign minister said here at a news conference which touched upon a wide range of topics.
The foreign minister was referring to Thursday’s meeting where Modi met political figures from occupied Jammu and Kashmir — the first high-level engagement since August 2019 when India revoked the region’s autonomy by scrapping Article 370 of its constitution and ended the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.
He said the conference called by the Indian prime minister “exposed the tall claims about normalcy of the situation in Jammu and Kashmir” which “ended up in failure”. He said there is “a wide gulf” between the aspirations of Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) government and the true representatives of Kashmiris who remain in search of their identity and the basic right of self-determination.
Qureshi said the last two years in occupied Jammu and Kashmir were all about the “siege of Kashmiri people” with routine incidents of extrajudicial killings, illegal detentions and abductions. “India has exercised all tools of state oppression to curb the determination of Kashmiris, however it has failed to subjugate them,” he said.
He mentioned that India’s illegal act resulted in economic loss with 50 per cent of industries closed in the valley.
To a question on India bringing demographic changes in occupied Jammu and Kashmir, he said since the step would have far-reaching implications, Pakistan had highlighted the matter at the highest fora including United Nations General Assembly, UN Security Council, during bilateral interactions of at the levels of prime minister and foreign minister, through parliamentary engagement and Geneva Council of Human Rights.
Qureshi, in response to a question on Prime Minister Imran Khan’s statement that nuclear capability would serve no purpose with the resolution of Kashmir dispute, said the country’s nuclear policy had “no aggressive designs”.
He, however, said that keeping the nuclear deterrent was in view of the neighbouring country which could have belligerent motives. “Such a decision [nuclear disarmament] is dependent on several factors, including the security environment, outstanding disputes and balance of force,” he said.
Asked if Pakistan and India were holding a backdoor channel of communication, he categorically dismissed the notion, however, said there existed a “time-to-time interaction at the intelligence level in area of regional security”.
To a question on rising violence in Afghanistan, he said Pakistan was concerned about the situation where several elements and “spoilers” could be held responsible who did not want to see peace and stability in Afghanistan.
He said Pakistan had been advocating and facilitating the Afghan peace process with its role of “becoming a part of solution and not problem”. “A negotiated political settlement in Afghanistan is in everybody’s Interest and is the best way forward,” he said.
Qureshi emphasised that the Afghans, including the government and Taliban, needed to sit together. “Whatever the outcome evolves out of their negotiations, Pakistan will respect that,” he added. “We will remain the partners of peace and not conflict.” Asked about the blame-game against Pakistan ahead of the meeting between US President Joe Biden and Afghan president Ashraf Ghani, he said: “They [Afghan government representatives] can say whatever they want, but the US knows Pakistan’s role very well and the world is not oblivious to our role.” The foreign minister said peace and stability in Afghanistan would ensure development and regional connectivity. However in case of a setback, Afghans would suffer the most, he added.
-
Walmart Chief Warns US Risks Falling Behind China In AI Training -
Wyatt Russell's Surprising Relationship With Kurt Russell Comes To Light -
Elon Musk’s XAI Co-founder Toby Pohlen Steps Down After Three Years Amid IPO Push -
Is Human Mission To Mars Possible In 10 Years? Jared Isaacman Breaks It Down -
‘Stranger Things’ Star Gaten Matarazzo Reveals How Cleidocranial Dysplasia Affected His Career -
Google, OpenAI Employees Call For Military AI Restrictions As Anthropic Rejects Pentagon Offer -
Peter Frampton Details 'life-changing- Battle With Inclusion Body Myositis -
Waymo And Tesla Cars Rely On Remote Human Operators, Not Just AI -
AI And Nuclear War: 95 Percent Of Simulated Scenarios End In Escalation, Study Finds -
David Hockney’s First English Landscape Painting Heads To Sotheby’s Auction; First Sale In Nearly 30 Years -
How Does Sia Manage 'invisible Pain' From Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome -
Halsey Mentions How She 'gained Control' Over Endometriosis Condition -
Teyana Taylor Says Choosing Movies Over Music 'dumb' Choice? -
Poland Joins Spain In Move To Ban Social Media For Children Under 15 -
Shia LaBeouf Sent To Rehab For Not Taking ‘alcohol Addiction Seriously’ -
‘Stingy’ Harry, Meghan Markle Crack Open A Chasm Despite Donation: ‘Do So At Your Own Peril’