LAHORE: The Punjab Information Commission (PIC) has imposed a penalty of Rs 10,000 on Parks and Horticulture Authority (PHA) Rawalpindi Director Admin Muhammad Masood for lying, giving a misleading statement and blocking information.
A citizen, Zeeshan Adal, had given an application to the director, PHA Rawalpindi, under the Right to Information Act 2013. He had sought information about PHA contracts, audit reports, income and expenses, signboards income, action against defaulters, staff working with Advertisement Section, responsibilities, authority, pay and facilities to the PHA chairman in the last three years. But the PHA did not give information in the stipulated time, following which Zeeshan lodged a complaint with the Punjab Information Commission (PIC). The PIC issued a notice to the PHA director Admin and public information officer.
Earlier, Masood appeared before the commission and said he had received no application. On persistence, he admitted that he had received the application from the PIC.
The PIC gave him time till March 22, but he neither appeared before the commission nor provided information. Thus the commission imposed a penalty of Rs 10,000 on him for lying and non-cooperation. The commission directed the accountant, District Accounts Office Rawalpindi, to deduct Rs 10,000 from the Masood’s salary and deposit it in the national exchequer.
The commission directed the director general, PHA Rawalpindi, to give a copy of the commission directives to Masood and ensure his presence on the next hearing on April 12. The commission said if the DG does not do so, he will also face action.
Court asked appellants to satisfy it on next hearing that how decision of single bench was not right
Petitioner’s lawyer informed court that parliament had passed 26th Constitutional Amendment
CM urged people to choose between resisting oppression and embracing freedom or continuing under shackles of slavery
Committee emphasised need for effective legislation to safeguard rights of parliamentarians
Muzammil Aslam highlighted need for 5,000 watersheds in KP, requiring an investment of Rs 115 billion
Justice Shahzad observed that with support of appellant, 85% power theft was witnessed in his locality