Why reward police for what they’re paid: LHC
LAHORE: Lahore High Court Chief Justice Muhammad Qasim Khan on Wednesday expressed his displeasure at the Punjab government’s decision to reward police officials for arresting the prime suspect in the Motorway gang-rape case.
The Chief Justice, who was hearing a case pertaining to the alleged illegal occupation of a government land by the police, questioned as to why the police should be rewarded for arresting suspect Abid Malhi when it was their duty.
“Is it not the job of the police to catch a criminal? If they don’t do that, what will they do? This is a new technique by the Punjab government, the CJ wondered. Under what law the reward has been announced by the government?”
On the court’s order, Punjab IGP Inam Ghani was present in the courtroom. Petitioners in the land grab case had said that an elite police training center was built on a 72-kanal government land owned by the Evacuee Trust Property Board.
They had complained to the court that the police were harassing them by sending officers of the Special Branch to the Board office.
The Chief Justice had directed them to submit a written request to the IGP for the registration of the FIR against the officers. He had asked the petitioners to approach this court if a case was not registered on their complaint. Justice Khan remarked that police officers were known for their involvement in land grabbing but now they had illegally occupied a government land. Justice Khan also reprimanded the IGP, saying “It is strange that police are being rewarded for arresting a culprit.” The police are responsible for lawlessness in the country and on the rampage to plunder national resources with impunity. The country has become a police state, he added.
“If this continues, policemen will first wait for a reward announcement and then nab suspects,” the judge remarked.
The federal law officer told the court that the training center had been built on the land of the Evacuee Trust Property Board to which Justice Khan said it was a trust property and the federal government was not authorized to dish out it to anyone. The proceedings were adjourned until Nov 3.
-
Lana Del Rey Announces New Single Co-written With Husband Jeremy Dufrene -
Ukraine-Russia Talks Heat Up As Zelenskyy Warns Of US Pressure Before Elections -
Lil Nas X Spotted Buying Used Refrigerator After Backlash Over Nude Public Meltdown -
Caleb McLaughlin Shares His Resume For This Major Role -
King Charles Carries With ‘dignity’ As Andrew Lets Down -
Brooklyn Beckham Covers Up More Tattoos Linked To His Family Amid Rift -
Shamed Andrew Agreed To ‘go Quietly’ If King Protects Daughters -
Candace Cameron Bure Says She’s Supporting Lori Loughlin After Separation From Mossimo Giannulli -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Are ‘not Innocent’ In Epstein Drama -
Reese Witherspoon Goes 'boss' Mode On 'Legally Blonde' Prequel -
Chris Hemsworth And Elsa Pataky Open Up About Raising Their Three Children In Australia -
Record Set Straight On King Charles’ Reason For Financially Supporting Andrew And Not Harry -
Michael Douglas Breaks Silence On Jack Nicholson's Constant Teasing -
How Prince Edward Was ‘bullied’ By Brother Andrew Mountbatten Windsor -
'Kryptonite' Singer Brad Arnold Loses Battle With Cancer -
Gabourey Sidibe Gets Candid About Balancing Motherhood And Career