LAHORE: The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) has accused PML-Q leaders Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain and Punjab Assembly Speaker Chaudhry Pervez Elahi of committing money laundering and accumulating illegal assets.
The wealth of Ch Pervez Elahi and his family members has increased to Rs 4.06 billion while the wealth of Ch Shujaat Hussain and his family members has gone up to Rs 2.55 billion from 1985 to 2018, revealed a reply submitted to the Lahore High Court by the National Accountability Bureau in connection with a petition by the Chaudhry brothers challenging three 20-year-old inquiries against them.
The investigation conducted so for revealed that the wealth of Ch Shujaat Hussain and his family has increased to Rs 2.556 billion. The shareholding of petitioner Ch Shujaat Hussain and his family has increased to Rs 58,487,450 in 2019 from Rs 22,500 in 1985. Further, the family of Ch Shujaat Hussain has acquired properties worth more than Rs 230 million. Ch Shujaat Hussain and his two sons namely Shafey Hussain and Salik Hussain have given a loan amounting to Rs 57,048 to different companies owned by them.
Moreover, foreign remittance of Rs 58,700 million has been received in bank accounts of Shafey Hussain and Salik Hussain since 2004. So far, 5 remitters have joined investigation proceedings and denied sending any remittance, which prima facie established that accused persons used fake identities to route unexplained money from foreign countries to Pakistan, the reply said.
The wealth of petitioner Ch Pervez Elahi and his family members has increased to Rs 4.069 billion from 1985 to 2018. The shareholding of Ch Pervez Elahi and his family members has increased to Rs 3 billion from 1985 to 2019. Further, the family of Pervez Elahi has acquired properties worth more than 250 million. Moreover, foreign remittance of Rs 978 million has been received in the bank accounts of the family of Pervez Elahi since 2004. So far three remitters have joined investigation proceedings and denied sending any remittance, which prima facie established that accused persons used fake identities to route unexplained money from foreign countries to Pakistan, the reply added.
The reply said Pervez Elahi, in another inquiry of misuse of authority, was accused of making illegal appointments in the Local Government Board during his stint as chief minister of Punjab.
The bureau said the inquiries of illegal assets and misuse of authority were never approved for closure by the competent authority and the investigation is being held strictly in accordance with the law. However, it said a third inquiry of willful default was approved for closure by the authority in 2017 for lack of evidence. The NAB asked the court to dismiss the petition of the Chaudhry brothers for being devoid of any merits.
The accused petitioners have been repeatedly asked through call up notices/letter to submit their version regarding assets acquired by them and their family members. The petitioners were also served with assets pro-forma to be submitted after filing the same. However, the accused petitioners miserably failed to submit requisite duly filled assets pro-forma and explain huge increase in their as well their family members’ wealth despite several extensions given on their requests. The evidence collected so far, prima facie, connects the petitioners with the commission of offences of corruption and corrupt practices as envisaged under the provision of NAO 1999, the report concluded.
The PML-Q leaders have approached the Lahore High Court, challenging three 20-year-old inquiries against them by the NAB. “In 2000, the then chairman of the respondent bureau proceeded to authorize investigation against the petitioners on allegations of misuse of authority, assets beyond means and willful default under the National Accountability Ordinance 1999,” the leaders stated in their three identical petitions filed through Advocate Amjad Pervez.
The petitioners, who are an important ally to the government of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, argued that the conduct of the bureau and the manner in which its officials use authority have been judicially noticed by the superior courts of the country in a number of cases. They pleaded that the all the three investigations were recommended for closure by the investigating officers and regional board of the NAB during 2017 and 2018 when the government of their political arch rivals was in place.
However, they submitted the NAB chairman approved in 2019 the bifurcation of investigations against them about the allegations of assets beyond means after an investigation spreading over a period of 19 years since authorization of investigation in the year 2000. They argued that the so called order for the bifurcation of the investigation after a lapse of about 20 years was for a purpose other than bona fide and the same was prompted by mala fide intention to contain and cage their (petitioners) role and their party in the political arena.
They claimed that not a single piece of evidence or material was available before the then chairman of the bureau to form an opinion in terms of Section 18(c) of NAO 1999 to pass an order for authorization of the investigations. The petitioners argued that the entire process from commencing and conducting the investigations is in violation of mandatory provisions of the ordinance. Therefore, they pleaded, all actions taken by the respondent bureau are illegal, without lawful authority and void ab-initio.
Reacting to the NAB statement, the Chaudhry brothers’ spokesman has said the institution of the NAB is being used for political engineering, old cases against them are being repeatedly opened and closed.
The spokesman said if re-hearing of a 20 years old case is not political engineering, what it is, whereas the filer of application is unknown and reasons for reopening of this matter are also not known. It is also not known why the media trial is being conducted while the case is in the court. He said the NAB, in its reply, has not been able to tell about any asset of the Chaudhry brothers, which is more than their income. There is no mention in the NAB reply of any corruption, kickbacks, misappropriation or misuse of powers. The NAB has itself closed the case of securing loans and getting these written off. The NAB accepted that the Chaudhrys had not secured any wrong loan nor got any loan written off but these very cases are repeatedly closed and opened for political engineering.
Targeting security forces dedicated to maintaining law and order is outright act of terrorism, says Bilawal
EAD data shows Pakistan received $259m from bilateral creditors during first four months of fiscal year
CM discusses several critical projects with Wapda Chairman Lt Gen Sajjad Ghani during meeting
Sindhu has been appointed on contract for one year, appointment is effective immediately until further notice
With approval of federal secretary science and technology, formal orders have been issued
Russia carried out strike on Ukrainian city of Dnipro which Putin said was test of its new missile
