SHC declares withholding income tax on judicial allowance ‘unlawful’
KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Friday held that amount of judicial allowance and special judicial allowance paid to the members of SHC as well and that of sub-ordinate judiciary was not part of their taxable salary income, hence, not chargeable as tax deduction.
Allowing petitions of the high court employees against deduction of income tax on judicial allowance and special judicial allowance, the SHC’s division bench headed by Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi ordered that withholding of income tax on the judicial and special judicial allowance is illegal and without lawful authority. The court directed income tax department not to withhold any amount of income tax from judicial allowance and special judicial allowance of the members of SHC and those of the sub-ordinate judiciary.
It ordered that amount already deducted from their salaries be refunded by the Federal Board of Revenue on their filing refund applications within three months from the date of such claims. The court observed that government's counsel has not been able to assist court as to how the judicial allowance and special judicial allowance does not fall within the category of the allowances covered within the exclusion of section 12(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.
The court observed that respondent counsel was asked when both the allowances are not deducted as taxes by the Punjab and Khyder Pakhtoonkhwa governments and the Federal Board of Revenue, why such a discriminatory attitude is being resorted to by Accountant General of Sindh or the Federal Board of Revenue in the case of SHC and subordinate judiciary in the Sindh. However, the respondent's counsel could not explanation on behalf of the federal and provincial governments.
The petitioners had submitted that deduction of income tax on the judicial allowance and special judicial allowance from their salaries at source under section 149 of the income tax Ordinance, 2001, by the Accountant General Sindh is unlawful and requested the court to declare it illegal and without lawful authority.
The federal government counsel opposed the petitions and submitted that every income is chargeable to tax unless exempted.
-
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Likely To Attend Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026 -
AI Next Big Trial: Elon Musk Calls For ‘Galileo Test’ To Prove True Intelligence -
US Appeals Court Affirms Trump’s Immigration Detention Policy -
Bella Hadid, Adan Banuelos Rekindle Romance After Brief Separation -
Jay-Z Shares Bold Advice With Bad Bunny For NFL Super Bowl Halftime Show Appearance -
Epstein Probe: Bill, Hillary Clinton Call For Public Testimony Hearing -
Brooklyn Beckham Considers Adoption As Nicola Peltz Can't Carry A Baby -
Expert Discusses 'complications' Of Measles Outbreak -
Kaley Cuoco Recalls Her Divorce With Karl Cook: 'I Was Gonna Die' -
Celine Dion Reveals Music She's Listening To Lately -
HR Exec Kristin Cabot To Speak At Crisis PR Conference After Coldplay Incident -
Why Travis Kelce Says Taylor Swift Has Made Him 'so Much Better'? -
Halle Berry Credits This Hairstyle With Launching Her Acting Career -
Hailee Steinfeld Spills Her 'no-phone' Rule With Husband Josh Allen -
Bowen Yang Gets Honest About Post SNL Life: 'It’s An Adjustment' -
Charlize Theron Delivers Strong Message At 2026 Winter Olympics Opening Ceremony