a resident of the vicinity where the tragedy occurred, Prof Masood Ahmed, concurred with Baloch's views. Visiting the site after the tragedy, he said the slope of a hill gives some stability to the brittle rocks which turn to clay-like substance and firm up at the bottom of the slope.
However, this face of the rock is not even 90 degrees, most of it is caved inwards due to the rampant construction along its sides. “Moreover, the Gulistan-e-Jauhar area is situated on a fault line. I have been telling people of the area not to build their houses around the hill because it is dangerous,” he said.
Dr Noman Ahmed, the chairman of NED’s department of architecture, while elaborating on the incident said the disintegration of natural soil strata in the area was giving rise to such tragedies, particularly in this area.
According to him, topographically, the terrain in Gulistan-e-Jauhar was a mixture of rocky and porous soil. Similarly, he said, the development too was uneven, with pockets of slum and concrete settlements at every short distance.
He said the rapid construction did have a role to play in generating man-made tragedies like this since construction over the top of the hill and around it required the use of heavy machinery on the brittle rocks. The reverberations caused by heavy machinery stay inside the brittle rock and then, suddenly, cause pieces to fall off.
Explaining this phenomenon, the former chairman of KU's geology department, Dr Majeedullah Qadri, said the rock comprised of horizontal layers of shale and sandstone, which were brittle, with some smattering of hard limestone.
“But the layers are not well bedded in each other,” he said. “Now there are a large number of houses built around the rock face where water is used up for sanitation and gardening purposes. The shale stone is brittle and comprises of clay minerals and they absorb water, while the limestone makes up the harder layers of the rock. So the combined effect of construction and seepage of water cause the clay minerals in the shale stone to expand and become slippery, also increasing in weight. Thus, if there happens to be a weak spot somewhere along the rock face, it falls off.”
Dr Qadri recommended leaving a space of at least 10 to 15 feet from the side of the rocks such as those in Gulistan-e-Jauhar. “A large number of houses have been built right next to the brittle rock face and they are in extreme danger,” he said.
According to the notification issued by the city commissioner on Tuesday, no building plan will be approved by the authorities for construction around any hill in the city. Another aspect being considered by the authorities is of China-cutting, but that too translates into the problem of thoughtless development on the ground.
Perhaps the report of the four-member committee set up to probe the matter will reveal more when its report, due to be released on Wednesday (today), surfaces.
However, Dr Noman Ahmed remarked that it was time the government and planning authorities stopped coming up with such knee-jerk reactions. “The problem is that we only respond to tragedies. To really resolve the city's development issues, we need a much more holistic solution for town planning while keeping the relevant by-laws and regulations in mind. A simple ban is not enough.”