US to reduce troops in Iraq ‘over coming months’
BAGHDAD: The United States said on Thursday it would reduce troops in Iraq in the coming months as friction between the two countries eased under a new US-friendly premier in Baghdad.
The United States also promised support to prop up the struggling Iraqi economy as the two nations held their first strategic dialogue in more than a decade.
Tensions skyrocketed following a US strike on Baghdad in January that killed Iranian general Qasem Soleimani and Iraqi commander Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, with lawmakers in Baghdad demanding the expulsion of the roughly 5,200 US troops in the country.
President Donald Trump responded by threatening crippling sanctions and, according to US military sources, Washington began planning a vast bombing spree against groups blamed for the rockets.
In a joint statement, the United States said that the reason for its military’s return to Iraq in 2014 -- defeating extremists from the Islamic State group -- had made major headway.
"The two countries recognized that in light of significant progress towards eliminating the ISIS threat, over the coming months the US would continue reducing forces from Iraq," a joint statement said.
"The United States reiterated that it does not seek nor request permanent bases or a permanent military presence in Iraq."
The coalition has already consolidated to just three bases in recent months, down from a dozen.
The joint statement, hashed out ahead of time, did not give figures and Thursday’s dialogue was brief, with David Schenker, the top US diplomat for the Middle East, telling reporters the delegations did not discuss a timeline for reducing troops.
Due to coronavirus travel restrictions, top-level talks expected to take place in Baghdad were demoted to a brief online kick-off session.
Tensions have calmed substantially since Mustafa Kadhemi -- an ex-spy chief with close ties to the US and its allies in the region -- took the reins as Iraq’s premier in May.
Two Iraqi officials said Kadhemi has been invited to the White House this year, a diplomatic olive branch his predecessor Adel Abdel Mahdi had never received.
"There was a lack of confidence in the relationship with the previous government," one of the officials said.
-
Meghan Markle 'terrified' Over Possible UK Return -
Did Opiate Restrictions Lead To Blake Garrett's Death? -
Royal Expert Reflects On Princess Eugenie, Beatrice 'priorities' Amid Strained Relationship With Sarah, Andrew -
Prince William's 'concerning' Statement About Andrew Is Not Enough? -
50 Cent Gets Called Out Over Using Slur For Cardi B -
Scientists Discover Rare Form Of 'magnets' That Might Surprise You -
Nancy Guthrie’s Kidnapper Will Be Caught Soon: Here’s Why -
AI Innovation Could Make Trade Secrets More Valuable Than Patents, Says Billionaire Investor -
King Charles Heckling: Calls For 10 BAFTAs And A Knighthood For Sign Language Interpreter -
Kim Kardashian Leaves Meghan Markle 'upset' With Latest 'cheap Shot' -
Royal Expert On Andrew, Sarah Ferguson’s ‘entitled’ Behaviour Since Marriage -
Instagram And YouTube Accused Of Engineering Addiction In Children’s Brains -
Trump Reached Out To Police Chief Investigating Epstein In 2006, Records Show -
Keke Palmer Praises Actor Who Inspired 'The Burbs' Role -
Humans May Have 33 Senses, Not 5: New Study Challenges Long-held Science -
Kim Kardashian Prepared To Have Child With Lewis Hamilton: 'Baby Using A Surrogate'