Too real
Everyone who wants global warming to be true – raise your hand. Of course, I mean the whole idea that burning fossil fuels has led to a rapid increase in the earth’s temperature which is causing a climate crisis that is escalating in its destruction and scientists say we have only a few years to avert worldwide cataclysmic devastation.
Again, raise your hand if you want that to be true. No sane person has his hand up.
About 15 years ago I realized that this crisis was a political issue. Teaching science to about 40 fifth-graders, using simple chalkboard diagrams, I explained fossil fuels, alternative energy sources, and how global warming occurs. I showed a video on the consequences of a too warm Earth (in fact, it predicted the very things that are happening now); the next day a student asked in what political party I was registered. Her dad wanted to know. I was stunned.
A few days later with urgency, I asked my principal if the video could be shown at a PTA meeting. “No, that’s a controversial subject,” was her flat response.
I knew we were in trouble; I just didn’t know how much.
How in the world did scientific research become so politicized, particularly when it’s about the havoc of extreme weather events which is killing humans, destroying homes, forests, animal species, and our ability to get food in the oceans and from drought and flood-ravaged farmland?
It was only after I quit teaching in 2012 to pursue a second career that I took the time to understand the answer to that question. And it’s simple. The fossil fuel companies that produce oil, natural gas, and coal, and the companies that benefit from those extracted products (like refineries that take oil and produce gasoline) have spent billions and billions of dollars to do two things:
One, spread lies to the American people that these fuels do not cause global warming, and two, influence politicians with campaign donations and lavish gifts through lobbyists and other means. The politicians are then willing to promote the same lies, write legislation that makes it easier for the companies to extract their products and hide the damage they’re doing, as well as, give them subsidies … yes, Congress gives our taxpayer money to these high-powered, massive billion-dollar businesses and provides multiple opportunities for them to avoid paying taxes on their enormous profits.
And think about it: When a region is destroyed by one of these extreme weather events (that scientists say is a result of climate change), who pays to rebuild? Well, of course, the American taxpayer, not the industries that knowingly caused the damage.
There’s proof that fossil fuel companies knew in the 1980s what was happening as a result of burning their products, but their greed was too great to sound the alarm. They did the opposite.
Excerpted from: 'Climate Crisis is Too Real to Ignore'.
Commondreams.org
-
Billie Eilish Slammed For Making Political Speech At Grammys -
Beverley Callard Announces Her Cancer Diagnosis: 'Quite Nervous' -
WhatsApp May Add Instagram Style Close Friends For Status Updates -
Winter Olympics Officially Open In Milan, Cortina With Historic Dual Cauldron Lighting -
Sciences Reveals Shocking Body Response Against Heart Attack -
Who Is Charlie Puth? Inside Awards, Hits & Journey Of Super Bowl Anthem Singer -
Jared Leto 'swings For The Fences' In 'Master Of The Universe'? -
Kelsea Ballerini, Chase Stokes Not On Same Page About Third Split: Deets -
Shanghai Fusion ‘Artificial Sun’ Achieves Groundbreaking Results With Plasma Control Record -
Princess Anne Enjoys Andrea Bocelli, Lang Lang Performances At Winter Olympics Opening Ceremony -
Ben Stiller Cherishes Working With Late David Bowie -
Anti-inflammatory Teas To Keep Your Gut Balanced -
Polar Vortex ‘exceptional’ Disruption: Rare Shift Signals Extreme February Winter -
Which Countries Are Worst And Best In Public Sector AI Race? -
Matthew McConaughey Opens Up About His Painful Battle With THIS -
Emma Stone Reveals She Is ‘too Afraid’ Of Her ‘own Mental Health’