Hyderabad Nizam case: UK High Court orders Pakistan to pay £6m in legal cost
LONDON: A High Court judge has ordered the Government of Pakistan to pay nearly £6 million in legal costs after the Pakistani representative told the court that it will not be appealing against the London High Court’s decision which ruled in favour of Nizam of Hyderabad’s descendants granting them right over £35 million funds.
On Thursday, Justice Marcus Smith, sitting in the Rolls Building of the London High Court for a “consequential hearing” ordered Pakistan to make payments, mainly to the The Nizam’s descendants, Prince Mukarram Jah, the titular eighth Nizam of Hyderabad; his younger brother Muffakham Jah; Indian government and the Natwest bank.
Pakistan has been ordered to pay £1,835,445.83 (65% on account of costs) to Prince Muffakham Jah; £2,802,192.22 to India; £795,064.63 (65% on account of his costs) to HEH VIII Nizam; and £367,387.90 in respect of the Bank's costs (the Bank's costs have already been paid from the fund so this payment is Pakistan reconstituting the fund in respect of those costs).
“Today’s hearing brings this litigation, which started in 2013 but where the underlying dispute dates back to in 1948, to an end at long last,” said Paul Hewitt, partner at Withers LLP, the law firm which acted for the eighth Nizam. “We are pleased that Pakistan has decided not to contest Mr Justice Smith’s judgment. Our client His Exalted Highness the VIII Nizam will now have access to the funds which his grandfather, HEH the VII Nizam, intended him to have,” he said.
Pakistan’s legal team told this reporter that it had received instructions from the Government of Pakistan not to appeal against the decision. A Pakistan High Commission source said the matter of legal costs and the court order will be placed before the next cabinet meeting and a decision will be taken then.
The source said the Pakistani government was already aware and Attorney General Anwar Mansoor held meetings in London few days ago where decision was taken not to appeal against the decision.
In October this year, Justice Marcus Smith had ruled that £35 million held in a Natwest account must go to the descendants of Indian royal Nizam of Hyderabad because Pakistan lacked evidence to prove its claim to £35 million held in the account and claimed jointly by the two sons of Nizam and Indian government.
The dispute started in 1948 when the last Nizam of Hyderabad Mir Osman Ali Khan deposited £1m in the UK account, held by the then Pakistan high commissioner, for safe-keeping because the then Nizam didn’t trust India and requested Pakistan to keep money for him. The seventh Nizam of Hyderabad had refused to join either India or Pakistan but he trusted Pakistan more than India.
Hyderabad in 1947-48 was a princely state and was annexed by India in 1948 in a military operation. The Nizam transferred money to London shortly before the annexation.
The money was transferred into an account in the name of the then Pakistan High Commissioner to the UK, Habib Ibrahim Rahimtoola. For over 70 years, the sum accrued interest and it’s now valued £35m.
The descendants of Nizam had joined hands with the Indian government in the legal battle against Pakistan.
Nizam VII had sought the return of funds in the 1950s, claiming that the transfer had been made without his authority. The bank took the stance that it was unwilling to return the fund without the agreement of Pakistan, which had legal title to the fund.
The case reached the House of Lords, which held that the question of who owned the fund could not be decided because Pakistan had claimed sovereign immunity. In 2013 Pakistan waived her sovereign immunity by issuing a claim for the fund that opened the way for the current case to proceed.
The court issued notice to Nizam’s sons informing them about Pakistan’s claim. Former High Commissioner Wajid Shamsual Hasan confirmed that the high commission then requested to withdraw the case but the court refused to grant permission.
The National Westminster Bank, in which the money had been deposited, refused to release the funds to either party until the case was resolved by the courts. The Pakistan Foreign Office in October said the judgment rejects the longstanding claims of the two major parties and upholds the claims of the heirs of Nizam of Hyderabad.
-
Why Kate Middleton, Prince William Opt For ‘show Stopping Style’ -
Here's Why Leonardo DiCaprio Will Not Attend This Year's 'Actors Award' Despite Major Nomination -
Ethan Hawke Reflects On Hollywood Success As Fifth Oscar Nomination Arrives -
Tom Cruise Feeling Down In The Dumps Post A Series Of Failed Romances: Report -
'The Pitt' Producer Reveals Why He Was Nervous For The New Ep Of Season Two -
Maggie Gyllenhaal Gets Honest About Being Jealous Of Jake Gyllenhaal -
'Bridgerton' Star Luke Thompson Gets Honest About Season Five -
Prince William On Verge Of Breakdown Because Of 'disgraced' Andrew -
Tig Notaro Reflects On Oscar Nod For 'Come See Me In The Good Light': 'I Was Sleeping' -
Kenyon Sadiq Sets 40-yard Dash Record At NFL Scouting Combine, Eyes First Round -
Talk Show Host Drops Hint About Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce Wedding Date -
Andrew Scandal Brings New Worries For Prince Harry, Meghan Markle -
King Charles Imposes New Restrictions On Ex-Prince Andrew In Surprise Move -
Chris Hemsworth Reveals How Elsa Pataky Guides His Career Moves -
Was Travis Barker In A Relationship With Kim Kardashian Before Marrying Her Sister? -
Brad Pitt Feeling Down In The Dumps After Kids' Snubs As Pals Continue To Paint Angelina Jolie A Villain