LHC seeks reply on plea against secret filming of individuals
Justice Jawad Hassan was hearing a public interest petition filed by Salman Sufi, a social activist, who works for women empowerment and gender reforms, in particular.
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Tuesday sought detailed replies from the federal and provincial governments on a petition seeking a declaration that secretly filming, recording or photographing of individuals both at private and public places without their knowledge or consent, in the absence of any overriding public interest, was an unconstitutional act.
Justice Jawad Hassan was hearing a public interest petition filed by Salman Sufi, a social activist, who works for women empowerment and gender reforms, in particular. He moved the petition in the wake of recent incidents wherein the privacy of women was breached at the hands of both government and private entities with no regulation or scope for prevention, control or sanction. The petition also referred to a 2017 report by the Digital Rights Foundation Pakistan that women were subjected to online violence that was markedly different from the experience of men. It said out of 3,027 cybercrime cases reported to the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) during August 2014-2015, 45 per cent involved electronic violence against women.
Sufi discussed a recent scandal of University of Balochistan where female students were subjected to harassment and blackmailed by the management staff through videos recorded by clandestine and officially installed cameras on campus. The petitioner pleaded that the right of privacy, especially pertaining to personal information, was inherently compounded and recognised in laws of Pakistan, but due to a lack of specific attribution it remained dormant with tacit ascriptions in other laws resulting in the deprivation of liberty and dignity for the citizens.
He asked the court to declare that installation and operation of CCTV cameras atany place accessible to the general public without displaying a proper notice or signage of the surveillance was unconstitutional and amounted to the breach of privacy.
He also sought directions to all public and private persons, bodies and institutions engaged in collection, storage or regulation of personal data of individuals to employ all necessary and proportionate safeguards against the prevention of leakage of the data. He said the organisations should be directed to identify all responsible persons with access to the data. Sufi argued the ministry of law and justice was needed to constitute a committee to advise and recommend legislation and promulgation of rules in pursuit of protection of “Constitutional Right of Privacy” of the subject. The judge directed the respondents to submit their replies by Dec 23.
-
Teyana Taylor Reveals What Lured Her Back To Music After Earning Fame In Acting Industry -
Prince William Shows He's Ready To Lead The Monarchy Amid Andrew Scandal -
Lux Pascal Gushes Over Role In Tom Ford's 'Cry To Heaven': 'I Just Wanted To Be Part Of This Picture' -
Near-blind Refugee Found Dead In Buffalo After Release By US Border Patrol -
Firm Steps In Forcing Andrew’s Hand: ‘Can No Longer Keep A Promise' -
Kenyan Man Accused Of Recruiting Men To Fight In Ukraine -
'The Wrong Paris' Star Veronica Long Shares What New Crime Series 'Blue Skies' Is About -
King Charles Remains Immersed In Work Amid Andrew Scrutiny -
Bobby J. Brown's Passing Adds To Growing List Of Celebrity Deaths In 2026 -
Prince William Fears For Andrew's Mental Health -
Paige DeSorbo Breaks Silence On New Relationship With Joe D'Amelio -
'Marshals' Showrunner Reveals If Kayce And Beth Will Cross Paths In 'Yellowstone' Spinoff -
Belgium Watchdog Launches Antitrust Probe Into Google Ads Business -
Andrew Ready To Fight Back: 'He's Very Vengeful' -
After Surpassing 100 Million YouTube Subscribers, BLACKPINK Returns With New Release -
Rihanna Sends Fans Into Frenzy With BTS Footage Of Music Making: Watch