PHC declares Conservancy Tax by cantonment boards illegal
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has ruled that Conservancy Tax imposed by the Cantonment Boards on shopkeepers and owners of commercial plazas in cantonment areas is illegal and directed the authorities to refund the money collected so far. A division bench comprising Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Irshad Qaisar
By Akhtar Amin
July 31, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has ruled that Conservancy Tax imposed by the Cantonment Boards on shopkeepers and owners of commercial plazas in cantonment areas is illegal and directed the authorities to refund the money collected so far.
A division bench comprising Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Irshad Qaisar announced the verdict, which was reserved a week ago. The shopkeepers of Cantonment Board Peshawar had filed the writ petition.
During hearing of the case, the petitioner’s lawyer Farman Ali Khattak submitted that the Cantonment Board authorities had imposed the Conservancy Tax on shopkeepers and owners of commercial plazas in 2013 in the cantonment areas.
He pointed out that the authorities were collecting the tax ranging from Rs500 to Rs800 with the claim that it was paid to cantonment employees for cleaning the areas and removing waste in front of the shops and shopping plazas.
The lawyer said that first there was no provision in the Cantonment Board Act 1924 to impose Conservancy Tax and second the petitioners or the owners of commercial plazas were paying the property tax to the Cantonment Board. He requested the bench to declare the tax as void and order recovery of the collected money in this respect.
However, the lawyer for the containment board could not defend the imposition of the tax. After hearing arguments, the court declared the Conservancy Tax illegal and ordered authorities to refund the collected money.
Ex-minister’s case left over: Separately, the writ petition of the PTI’s former provincial minister for mines and minerals Ziaullah Afridi was left over by another bench of the high court comprising of Justice Irshad Qaisar and Justice Roohul Amin due to shortage of time.
The high court would announce a date for hearing the case, in which the former minister had challenged his arrest by the Ehtesab Commission KP. Hidayatullah Afridi, had challenged the arrest in the high court through his lawyers Abdul Latif Afridi and Muazzam Butt.
A division bench comprising Justice Yahya Afridi and Justice Irshad Qaisar announced the verdict, which was reserved a week ago. The shopkeepers of Cantonment Board Peshawar had filed the writ petition.
During hearing of the case, the petitioner’s lawyer Farman Ali Khattak submitted that the Cantonment Board authorities had imposed the Conservancy Tax on shopkeepers and owners of commercial plazas in 2013 in the cantonment areas.
He pointed out that the authorities were collecting the tax ranging from Rs500 to Rs800 with the claim that it was paid to cantonment employees for cleaning the areas and removing waste in front of the shops and shopping plazas.
The lawyer said that first there was no provision in the Cantonment Board Act 1924 to impose Conservancy Tax and second the petitioners or the owners of commercial plazas were paying the property tax to the Cantonment Board. He requested the bench to declare the tax as void and order recovery of the collected money in this respect.
However, the lawyer for the containment board could not defend the imposition of the tax. After hearing arguments, the court declared the Conservancy Tax illegal and ordered authorities to refund the collected money.
Ex-minister’s case left over: Separately, the writ petition of the PTI’s former provincial minister for mines and minerals Ziaullah Afridi was left over by another bench of the high court comprising of Justice Irshad Qaisar and Justice Roohul Amin due to shortage of time.
The high court would announce a date for hearing the case, in which the former minister had challenged his arrest by the Ehtesab Commission KP. Hidayatullah Afridi, had challenged the arrest in the high court through his lawyers Abdul Latif Afridi and Muazzam Butt.
-
Is Human Mission To Mars Possible In 10 Years? Jared Isaacman Breaks It Down -
‘Stranger Things’ Star Gaten Matarazzo Reveals How Cleidocranial Dysplasia Affected His Career -
Google, OpenAI Employees Call For Military AI Restrictions As Anthropic Rejects Pentagon Offer -
Peter Frampton Details 'life-changing- Battle With Inclusion Body Myositis -
Waymo And Tesla Cars Rely On Remote Human Operators, Not Just AI -
AI And Nuclear War: 95 Percent Of Simulated Scenarios End In Escalation, Study Finds -
David Hockney’s First English Landscape Painting Heads To Sotheby’s Auction; First Sale In Nearly 30 Years -
How Does Sia Manage 'invisible Pain' From Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome -
Halsey Mentions How She 'gained Control' Over Endometriosis Condition -
Teyana Taylor Says Choosing Movies Over Music 'dumb' Choice? -
Poland Joins Spain In Move To Ban Social Media For Children Under 15 -
Shia LaBeouf Sent To Rehab For Not Taking ‘alcohol Addiction Seriously’ -
‘Stingy’ Harry, Meghan Markle Crack Open A Chasm Despite Donation: ‘Do So At Your Own Peril’ -
Research Explores How TikTok’s Recommendation System May Influence Teen Beliefs -
Google Wins Approval To Export South Korea’s High-precision Maps After 20 Years—With Strict Conditions -
King Charles’ Health Battle: What Has Been Revealed About His Cancer So Far