PHC restrains Tesco from collecting surcharges
Fata industrial units
By our correspondents
July 29, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Tuesday restrained the Tribal Electric Supply Company (Tesco) from collecting tariff and financial cost surcharges in the monthly electricity bills of the industrial units in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).
A division bench comprising of Mrs Justice Irshad Qaiser and Justice Roohul Amin issued the stay order on recovery of the two newly imposed surcharges in a writ petition filed by certain industrial units including Kohat Textiles Mills, Lahore Steel Mills, Kohat Cement Factory and others established in the Frontier Region Kohat.
The bench also issued notice to the Tesco and the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) to submit written replies in the writ petition before the next hearing. The petitioners’ lawyers Shiraz Butt and Rahmanullah submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Tesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the verdicts of the superior courts.
They submitted that the people of tribal areas couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges as the industrial units and factories have been greatly affected by the years-long terrorism activities and military operations.After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Tesco from collecting the surcharges till the next order of the court.
A division bench comprising of Mrs Justice Irshad Qaiser and Justice Roohul Amin issued the stay order on recovery of the two newly imposed surcharges in a writ petition filed by certain industrial units including Kohat Textiles Mills, Lahore Steel Mills, Kohat Cement Factory and others established in the Frontier Region Kohat.
The bench also issued notice to the Tesco and the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) to submit written replies in the writ petition before the next hearing. The petitioners’ lawyers Shiraz Butt and Rahmanullah submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Tesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the verdicts of the superior courts.
They submitted that the people of tribal areas couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges as the industrial units and factories have been greatly affected by the years-long terrorism activities and military operations.After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Tesco from collecting the surcharges till the next order of the court.
-
Czech Republic Supports Social Media Ban For Under-15 -
Prince William Ready To End 'shielding' Of ‘disgraced’ Andrew Amid Epstein Scandal -
Chris Hemsworth Hailed By Halle Berry For Sweet Gesture -
Blac Chyna Reveals Her New Approach To Love, Healing After Recent Heartbreak -
Royal Family's Approach To Deal With Andrew Finally Revealed -
Super Bowl Weekend Deals Blow To 'Melania' Documentary's Box Office -
Meghan Markle Shares Glitzy Clips From Fifteen Percent Pledge Gala -
Melissa Jon Hart Explains Rare Reason Behind Not Revisting Old Roles -
Meghan Markle Eyeing On ‘Queen’ As Ultimate Goal -
Japan Elects Takaichi As First Woman Prime Minister After Sweeping Vote -
Kate Middleton Insists She Would Never Undermine Queen Camilla -
King Charles 'terrified' Andrew's Scandal Will End His Reign -
Winter Olympics 2026: Lindsey Vonn’s Olympic Comeback Ends In Devastating Downhill Crash -
Adrien Brody Opens Up About His Football Fandom Amid '2026 Super Bowl' -
Barbra Streisand's Obsession With Cloning Revealed -
What Did Olivia Colman Tell Her Husband About Her Gender?