PHC restrains Tesco from collecting surcharges
Fata industrial units
By our correspondents
July 29, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Tuesday restrained the Tribal Electric Supply Company (Tesco) from collecting tariff and financial cost surcharges in the monthly electricity bills of the industrial units in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).
A division bench comprising of Mrs Justice Irshad Qaiser and Justice Roohul Amin issued the stay order on recovery of the two newly imposed surcharges in a writ petition filed by certain industrial units including Kohat Textiles Mills, Lahore Steel Mills, Kohat Cement Factory and others established in the Frontier Region Kohat.
The bench also issued notice to the Tesco and the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) to submit written replies in the writ petition before the next hearing. The petitioners’ lawyers Shiraz Butt and Rahmanullah submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Tesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the verdicts of the superior courts.
They submitted that the people of tribal areas couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges as the industrial units and factories have been greatly affected by the years-long terrorism activities and military operations.After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Tesco from collecting the surcharges till the next order of the court.
A division bench comprising of Mrs Justice Irshad Qaiser and Justice Roohul Amin issued the stay order on recovery of the two newly imposed surcharges in a writ petition filed by certain industrial units including Kohat Textiles Mills, Lahore Steel Mills, Kohat Cement Factory and others established in the Frontier Region Kohat.
The bench also issued notice to the Tesco and the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) to submit written replies in the writ petition before the next hearing. The petitioners’ lawyers Shiraz Butt and Rahmanullah submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Tesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the verdicts of the superior courts.
They submitted that the people of tribal areas couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges as the industrial units and factories have been greatly affected by the years-long terrorism activities and military operations.After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Tesco from collecting the surcharges till the next order of the court.
-
50 Cent Super Bowl Ad Goes Viral -
'The Housemaid' Lifts Company's Profits: Here's How -
Michael Douglas Recalls Director's Harsh Words Over 'Wall Street' Performance -
Henry Czerny On Steve Martin Created Humor On 'Pink Panther' Set -
Lady Victoria Hervey: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's Ex-girlfriend Proud Of Being On Epstein Files -
Dolly Parton Created One Of Her Iconic Tracks With Acrylic Nails? -
Parents Alarmed As Teens Form Emotional Bonds With AI Companion Chatbots -
Denzel Washington Surprises LeBron James -
Cillian Murphy's Hit Romantic Drama Exits Prime Video: Here's Why -
Paris Hilton Reveals What Keeps Her Going In Crazy Schedule -
Deep Freeze Returning To Northeastern United States This Weekend: 'Dangerous Conditions' -
Inside Dylan Efron's First 'awful' Date With Girlfriend Courtney King -
'Sugar' Season 2: Colin Farrell Explains What Lies Ahead After THAT Plot Twist -
‘Revolting’ Sarah Ferguson Crosses One Line That’s Sealed Her Fate As Well As Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s -
AI Rivalry Heats Up As Anthropic Targets OpenAI In Super Bowl Ad -
Kate Middleton, Prince William Share Message Ahead Of Major Clash