PHC stops Pesco from collecting two surcharges
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday stopped Peshawar Electric Supply Company (Pesco) from collecting Tariff Surcharge and Financial Cost Surcharge in the monthly electricity bills of industrial units in the province. A single bench of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth suspended the notification regarding imposition of the new surcharges
By our correspondents
July 25, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Friday stopped Peshawar Electric Supply Company (Pesco) from collecting Tariff Surcharge and Financial Cost Surcharge in the monthly electricity bills of industrial units in the province.
A single bench of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth suspended the notification regarding imposition of the new surcharges while hearing writ petitions of industrial units and factories. The court directed the federal government and Pesco to submit replies before the next hearing.
The petitioners’ lawyer Shumail Ahmad Butt submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Pesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the decisions of the superior courts. He submitted that the people of this province were already facing price-hike and they couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges.
He argued that under Article 157 (2) (c) of Constitution the power to impose such surcharges rested with the provincial government. He stated that the federal government imposed the surcharges through Finance Act, which was unlawful as the government could only impose taxes and not surcharges under the act. After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Pesco from collecting the surcharges till next order of the court.
A single bench of Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth suspended the notification regarding imposition of the new surcharges while hearing writ petitions of industrial units and factories. The court directed the federal government and Pesco to submit replies before the next hearing.
The petitioners’ lawyer Shumail Ahmad Butt submitted before the bench that on June 10, 2015 the Pesco on the direction of the federal government imposed the two new surcharges, arguing that this was in violation of the law and the decisions of the superior courts. He submitted that the people of this province were already facing price-hike and they couldn’t afford such illegal surcharges.
He argued that under Article 157 (2) (c) of Constitution the power to impose such surcharges rested with the provincial government. He stated that the federal government imposed the surcharges through Finance Act, which was unlawful as the government could only impose taxes and not surcharges under the act. After the preliminary hearing, the bench suspended the notification and issued the stay order restraining the Pesco from collecting the surcharges till next order of the court.
-
Polar Vortex ‘exceptional’ Disruption: Rare Shift Signals Extreme February Winter -
Which Countries Are Worst And Best In Public Sector AI Race? -
Matthew McConaughey Opens Up About His Painful Battle With THIS -
Emma Stone Reveals She Is ‘too Afraid’ Of Her ‘own Mental Health’ -
China Unveils ‘Star Wars’-like Missile Warship For Space Combat -
King Charles Facing Pressure Inside Palace Over 'Andrew Problem' -
Trump Refuses Apology For Video Depicting Obama As Apes Amid Growing Backlash -
Jesy Nelson Reflects On Leaving Girls' Band Little Mix -
World’s First Pokemon Theme Park Opens In Tokyo, Boosts Japan Tourism -
Waymo Trains Robotaxis In Virtual Cities Using DeepMind’s Genie 3 -
5 Simple Rules To Follow For Smooth, Healthy Hair -
$44 Billion Bitcoin Blunder: Bithumb Exchange Apologizes For Accidental Payout -
Katie Price Ends Public Feud With Ex Peter Andre After 16 Years -
Apple May Bring ChatGPT And Other AI Apps To CarPlay -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Likely To Attend Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026 -
AI Next Big Trial: Elon Musk Calls For ‘Galileo Test’ To Prove True Intelligence