The Indian media fails Kashmiris - again

Recalling the stellar role of the Indian media during the infamous internal emergency imposed by the late Indira Gandhi, Lal Krishna Advani, the BJP patriarch now forcibly retired, famously noted: “You were asked to bend but you began to crawl.”

Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, well known for his love of the fourth estate right from his Gujarat days, the media seems to have gone a step further. It has not just begun crawling, it has firmly shut its mouth as well as its eyes and ears on most issues. Reading dutifully from the hymn sheet provided by the powers that be, especially on issues that are ostensibly linked to the national interest, it has been acting as its master’s voice.

Look at the abject surrender of the fourth estate on the catastrophe that the BJP has inflicted on Kashmir. The bulk of the media, save for a couple of shining exceptions, has chosen to turn its back on the epic tragedy of Kashmir and Kashmiris. In fact, many journalists, especially those in the electronic media, have been falling over themselves to sing endless paeans to Modi and Amit Shah for their betrayal of the historic promises made by India’s founding fathers to Kashmir. They see no irony in how the world’s largest and much feted democracy has quietly and cravenly stolen Kashmiri democracy and the fundamental rights of the Kashmiri people.

It’s been nearly a month since the BJP’s power grab in the Himalayan paradise and people still remain locked down, as prisoners in their own homes. Essential services such as transport, hospitals and communication remain frozen, leading to many avoidable tragedies. More than 200 newspapers and other publications published from the state, some of the most independent in the country, remain suspended. This is perhaps the world’s first and all-pervasive blackout of its kind, in which an entire population of a state has been imprisoned for so long. Israel would be proud.

Instead of protesting this unprecedented communication blackout and standing with the media fraternity in Kashmir, the Press Council of India in its wisdom has chosen to lend its support to the government.

At a time when much of the world media has been focused on Kashmir, reporting in great detail how the BJP has turned the Muslim majority state into a colony at gunpoint, the media watchdog has opted to justify the most repressive crackdown on the Press freedom and Kashmiri civil liberties. Shocking as this sell-out by the media watchdog is, it is hardly surprising. This is how most venerable institutions in the blessed democracy have been surrendering their independence to the power of an intrusive and manipulative government.

That much of the media has turned rotten is hardly a secret. Anyone who regularly watches television news or reads newspaper wouldn’t be unfamiliar with all the hate, bigotry and intolerance openly peddled by the leading players in the name of journalism and debate. Not a day passes without leading lights of the English, Hindi or regional media raking up some issue or the other to foment sectarian hatred and strife. If it is not the wicked Pakistanis and their mischievous support for Kashmiri militants, then it is the Indian Muslims who find themselves in the dock for some imagined sin or the other. Summoning some moth-eaten ‘experts’, perpetually ranting former military types and a poor ‘maulvi’ who can barely articulate, they hold a kangaroo court every night whose outcomes are all too well known.

In mature democracies, the media is known to deal with minorities with sensitivity. The fourth estate, like the judiciary, stands with the underdog. It’s only in India that minorities, especially Muslims, are the most tempting target for everyone. From portraying the voiceless minority that has all but disappeared from all spheres of national activity as a dead weight, to demonising them as terrorists and criminals, the media’s favourite pastime is to prey on Muslims.

The same media, on the other hand, hasn’t just failed to confront the majoritarian fascism and its horrific crimes against minorities, it has been openly pushing its dangerous agenda.

Sometime ago an expose by Cobrapost, known for its investigations, revealed that almost everyone in the media is willing and ready to push a particular agenda for a price.

As part of his investigation, journalist Pushp Sharma, presenting himself as a representative of a Hindutva outfit, met management of more than two dozen media entities, seeking to influence their editorial agenda. He found out that the media is ready to shed its objectivity to “influence India’s electoral process through undesirable means.”

Sharma offered to pay anything between Rs6 crore ($922, 800) and Rs50 crore ($7,690,000) if they agreed to provide a platform to his media campaign. “The lure of lucre proved too irresistible for almost all media houses, be it print, electronic or digital, to say no. To the utter shock of the investigative journalist, most of them not only agreed to do what he asked for but also suggested myriad ways of undertaking a well-orchestrated, overtly communal media campaign on behalf of their prospective big-ticket client,” reported Cobrapost.

Some of the owners or important functionaries confessed that they were either already associated with the RSS or they were pro-Hindutva and would thus be happy to support the campaign, forgetting the cardinal principle of journalism: neutrality.

Some of them agreed to plant stories in favour of the party in power in their publications. Many of them agreed to develop and carry advertorials especially for this purpose. Some of them offered to do complete media management to plant stories favouring the party in power in other publications.

In conclusion, Cobrapost notes: “Although one may argue that such violations are hypothetical, given [the] Indian media’s penchant for twisting facts or serving pure rumours as news, especially during civil strife to foment communal sentiments, pleasing political masters of the day and tweaking news in favour of corporate interests, one can imagine how dangerous it is for Indian democracy. What our investigation shows is symptomatic of the malaise that has set deep in the labyrinths of the citadel called Fourth Estate. It also shows that Indian media is on sale, lock, stock and barrel!”

Having studied the media and repeatedly written about its increasing saffronisation and total lack of objectivity, one couldn’t agree more. This would be perhaps tolerable if the issue had only been about the negative portrayal of minorities and pushing a certain political line. What many leading voices of the media like Times Now, India Today and Republic TV, not to mention hundreds of regional publications and television networks, have been doing is often purvey hatred, intolerance and even violence based on fake news, rumours and prejudice. In their support for the Right and the ruling dispensation, most of them do not observe the basics of fair and balanced journalism.

Anchors like Arnab Goswami hold court every night dispensing summary, swift ‘justice’. It’s no coincidence that he and his kind are most unforgiving on Congress and other opposition parties and are almost reverential to Modi and other BJP bigwigs. But it all makes sense considering most of the television channels and newspapers are owned by big corporates friendly with the powers that be in India. As much as 80 percent of the media is owned by business groups like Reliance.

This is a disturbing state of affairs, to say the least. And this is not a problem of minorities or secular parties. The threat is to Indian democracy itself. Because a free, independent and objective press is essential to a healthy democracy. One cannot exist without the other.

The writer is an independent writer and former editor.

Email: Aijaz.syed@hotmail.com

Twitter: @AijazZaka