Growers move SHC against non-payment of last 20 years’ quality premium
A body of growers on Saturday filed a petition with the Sindh High Court (SHC) seeking action against sugar mills’ owners for not paying quality premium to the growers for the crushing seasons of the last 20 years between 1998-99 and 2018-19, and the minimum procurement price of sugar cane at Rs182 per 40 kilogrammes (kg) to the growers for the 2018-19 crushing season.
The Sindh Growers Alliance submitted in the petition that the sugar mills’ owners were liable to pay the growers the quality premium at the end of the crushing season at such rates as may be determined by the government in proportion of the sucrose recovery of such factory in excess of the base level sucrose contents, viz. 8.7 per 40 kg.
Petitioner’s counsel Syed Mureed Ali Shah submitted that the sugar mills had gone in litigation against the raise of 32 paisa per 40 kg to 50 paisa per 40 kg and obtained stay from the higher judiciary.
The counsel submitted that the Supreme Court had dismissed the petitions of the sugar mills on March 5, 2018 and observed that the grant of quality premium was just and fair based on statutory provisions.
He argued that the apex court held that the impugned notification was validly issued and observed that in the future, a notification as per the past practice for payment of quality premium should be issued along with the notification of fixation of the minimum procurement price of sugar cane and the same should be paid to the growers not later than two months after the crushing season was over.
He submitted that the Sindh government had issued a notification in compliance with the Supreme Court order and directed the sugar factories in the province to pay quality premium to the cane growers at the end of the crushing season 2018-19 at the rate of fifty paisa per 40 kg cane for each 0.1 per cent of excess sucrose recovery above 8.7 per cent determined on the overall sucrose recovery basis of each mill.
The lawyer said despite the SC judgment, the sugar mills had miserably failed to pay quality premium to the sugar cane growers for the crushing seasons from 1998-1999 to 2018-19 and it was clearly proved beyond any doubt that 37 sugar mills were actively involved in continuously violating, disobeying, obstructing and making mockery of the judgment of the SC and they were liable to be punished for violating the court orders.
The SHC was requested to punish the sugar mills’ owners for not paying quality premium to the growers for the crushing seasons between 1998-99 and 2018-19 in violation of the court orders and direct the government to implement its notification and take coercive action against the respondents.
-
Jake Humphrey Shares The Powerful Meaning Behind His Wrist Tattoo -
Matthew Lillard Weighs In On His Return To The 'Scream' Franchise After Decades Of Persistence -
Travis, Jason Kelce Share Blunt Dating Advice For Men: 'She's Gonna Hate You' -
Australia To Launch First High-speed Bullet Train After 50-years Delay -
Meghan Markle Turns To Desperate Bids & Her Kids Are Her ‘saving Grace’: Here’s What They’ll Do -
King Charles Gives A Nod To Sister Anne's Latest Royal Visit -
Christian Bale Shares Rare Views On Celebrity Culture Urging Fans Not To Meet Him In Person -
Ariana Grande To Skip Actor Awards Despite Major Nomination -
North Carolina Teen Accused Of Killing Sister, Injuring Brother In Deadly Attack -
Ryan Gosling Releases Witty 'Project Hail Mary' Ad With Sweet Reference To Eva Mendes -
Teyana Taylor Reveals What Lured Her Back To Music After Earning Fame In Acting Industry -
Prince William Shows He's Ready To Lead The Monarchy Amid Andrew Scandal -
Lux Pascal Gushes Over Role In Tom Ford's 'Cry To Heaven': 'I Just Wanted To Be Part Of This Picture' -
Near-blind Refugee Found Dead In Buffalo After Release By US Border Patrol -
Firm Steps In Forcing Andrew’s Hand: ‘Can No Longer Keep A Promise' -
Kenyan Man Accused Of Recruiting Men To Fight In Ukraine