Tyrian White case: Islam wants people’s personal lives private, says IHC
The petitioner Hafiz Ehtesham alleged that Prime Minister Imran Khan did not reveal that he had a daughter ‘Tyrian’ in his nomination papers. “He lied about his daughter that’s why he is not Sadiq and Ameen.”
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday dismissed a petition seeking disqualification of Prime Minister Imran Khan and said a fine would be imposed on similar petition if received in future.
Division bench of Islamabad High Court comprising Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb resumed the hearing of the petition submitted by Hafiz Ehtesham, spokesperson of the Lal Masjid's Shuhada Foundation.
The petitioner Hafiz Ehtesham alleged that the prime minister did not reveal that he had a daughter ‘Tyrian’ in his nomination papers. “He lied about his daughter that’s why he is not Sadiq and Ameen.”
During the hearing, Justice Athar Minallah questioned the petitioner that had he read the Article 63(H)? Justice Athar further remarked that if he had checked Article 63(h), which deals with moral issues, and said the first principle of Islam is to keep someone’s personal life private. Therefore, private matters of any person should not be brought in the court, the judge remarked.
To this, the petitioner Ehtesham argued in court Imran Khan is public officeholder and therefore his personal matters could not be considered beyond scrutiny. To this, Justice Minallah remarked Article 63(1)(h) of the Constitution, under which the petitioner had sought PM Khan's disqualification. The Article 63(1)(h) stipulates that a person convicted of a crime of "moral turpitude" and sentenced to jail for not less than two years can contest elections if five years have lapsed since his release.
The judge further remarked that in Islam, it has been said that one should attempt to brush other’s private matters under the carpet. To this, the petitioner argued that yes Islam has forbidden to discuss personal lives of others but it is also written in Article 62 (1)(d) that character of member National Assembly should be according to this.
To this, Justice Athar Minallah remarked that it means we should expunge Article 63 (h). He remarked, “Such petitions are only wastage of time.” Justice Minallah also warned the petitioner that if such requests were submitted in the future, the petitioner would be fined. PM Imran Khan’s counsel Dr Babar Awan was present in court. However, he did not need to present his arguments, as the court discarded the petition while hearing the petitioner.
-
'Elderly' Nanny Arrested By ICE Outside Employer's Home, Freed After Judge's Order -
Keke Palmer On Managing Growing Career With 2-year-old Son: 'It's A Lot' -
Key Details From Germany's Multimillion-euro Heist Revealed -
David E. Kelley Breaks Vow To Cast Wife Michelle Pfeiffer In 'Margo's Got Money Troubles' -
AI-powered Police Robots To Fight Crime By 2028: Report -
Everything We Know About Jessie J's Breast Cancer Journey -
Winter Olympics 2026: What To Watch In Men’s Hockey Today -
Winnie Harlow Breaks Vitiligo Stereotypes: 'I'm Not A Sufferer' -
Apple Martin Opens Up About Getting 'crazy' Lip Filler -
Why Did OpenAI Remove One Crucial Word From Its Mission Statement? -
Prince William Warned His Future Reign Will Be Affected By Andrew Scandal -
Amy Madigan Reflects On Husband Ed Harris' Support After Oscar Nomination -
Is Studying Medicine Useless? Elon Musk’s Claim That AI Will Outperform Surgeons Sparks Debate -
Margot Robbie Gushes Over 'Wuthering Heights' Director: 'I'd Follow Her Anywhere' -
'The Muppet Show' Star Miss Piggy Gives Fans THIS Advice -
Sarah Ferguson Concerned For Princess Eugenie, Beatrice Amid Epstein Scandal