Modi’s disastrous first year

When Narendra Modi arrived in New Delhi to be sworn in as India’s prime minister, he flew in a private aircraft belonging to the Adani Group, although he could have taken a commercial flight or a chartered plane. On landing, he was greeted with the communal-military slogan Har Har Modi.
The two events showed where Prime Minister Modi’s loyalties and priorities would lie: with Big Business and Hindutva, both of which he had served with pious zeal in Gujarat since the anti-Muslim pogrom of 2002 and through crony-capitalist deals later.
Over the past year, he has showered favours on both, and antagonised many who voted for him. His honeymoon period has ended, but he hasn’t fully understood that.
This was proved by a third development. That’s Modi’s May 16 statement in Shanghai to an Indian audience: “Earlier, you felt ashamed of being born Indian, now you feel proud to represent the country...” He repeated this in Seoul, adding the religious motif of “sins” committed in past life as the cause of being born Indian.
Modi thus gratuitously insulted Indian citizens. The use of terms like ‘shame’ and ‘sin’ reveals deep insecurity and an inferiority complex in Modi’s persona, which psychologists should analyse.
The boastful claim that India’s ‘mood’ has changed dramatically in a year is meant to cover up that inferiority – the way Hitler and Mussolini tried to do by declaring they had made the German and Italian people “proud” through military aggression and by making the “trains run on time”!
What’s the first-year balance-sheet of Modi’s government? Frankly speaking, it’s overwhelmingly negative. India has socially regressed in multiple ways, economically become more unequal, and politically got further polarised in an unhealthy manner.
India’s social regression is evident in the growth of rabid communalism, attacks on democratic rights, censorship of free speech, intolerance towards dissent,

spread of authoritarian ideas, greater licence to male-supremacism and violence against women, insecurity among the religious minorities, all amidst neglect of human development.
The Ramzada-Haramzada abuse, ghar wapsi and calls for depriving Muslims of the right to vote are just the crassest forms of the present outbreak of communalism. The government’s indulgence towards them sends a message: it’s India’s open season to malign non-Hindus, ban the sale of beef and even slaughter of bulls, impose the Bhagwad-Gita on schools, and build a cult around Gandhi’s assassin Godse.
The message is amplified when those charged with Gujarat’s ‘fake encounters’ and communal killings, including BJP president Amit Shah, are discharged without trial; but the entire might of the state is brought to bear against secular campaigners like Teesta Setalvad – because they tried to bring the culprits of Gujarat-2002 to justice.
There have been savage cuts in social sector budgets: 20 percent in health, 29 percent in Mid-Day Meal schemes, 17 percent in education, 51 percent in women and child welfare, and so on. Central transfers to the states, which implement many social schemes, were cut by 30 percent.
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act had its worst-ever performance under Modi. In 2014-15, the number of person-days of work created was 40 percent less than two years ago. Only three percent of families got the promised 100 days of work, and 70 percent of wages were delayed – to disastrous effect in a year of acute agrarian distress. Employment growth in industry has fallen to barely a fifth of what’s needed to absorb the growing workforce.
The suit-boot-ki-sarkar is shamelessly pro-rich and anti-poor. It’s cajoling capital to invest. But investment isn’t forthcoming. Fifty-two percent of India’s top 500 companies are excessively indebted, 14 percent of bank loans have gone bad.
Modi has failed to diagnose this, and believes that the key to stimulate investment is threefold: dismantle environmental regulations, allow unbridled diversion of agricultural land to industry (hence the land ordinance), and ‘reform’ labour laws to allow hire-and-fire.
The first approach has meant ruthless ‘fast-tracking’ of industrial-project clearances without scrutiny, violating the Forest Rights Act and coastal zone regulations, and redefining ‘forests’.
The high-level (TSR Subrahmanyam) committee has recommended far-reaching changes in environmental laws, including abolition of pollution control boards, self-certification of environment-related information by project promoters, and automatic clearances for roads and power-lines through forests, etc. But environmental regulations are no obstacle to industry: over 94 percent of proposals have been cleared since 2007.
Land has become an extremely contentious issue. The UPA’s land law was meant to give farmers and those dependent indirectly on agriculture a stake in determining their fate – necessary since some 60 million people have been displaced from land since 1947, mostly without rehabilitation.
The NDA’s ordinance undermines this rationale. It is opposed tooth-and-nail by a wide spectrum of parties and farmers’ organisations. A land agitation could turn politically explosive.
The government is sitting on lakhs of acres it acquired for military use and Special Economic Zones, but hasn’t distributed. The ordinance will give private capital free access to land and what lies under it, especially minerals – a huge racket. This has become a Modi obsession.
The planned dismantling of labour protections will rob workers of the right to form unions (for which the minimum membership has been raised from seven to 100). No permission will be needed to lay off workers or close factories with 100 workers; these account for 90 percent of the total number of units. The factories Act will also be undermined, dismantling safety rules. Employment of contract labour for permanent work will become rampant.
Politically, Modi is running the most over-centralised government in India’s history. This cannot work without destroying decision-making integrity and creating insecurity among bureaucrats and ministers; indeed, RSS men have been appointed as ‘officers on special duty’ to spy on them. This makes nonsense of cabinet government.
Modi has introduced venomous confrontation into politics, against the spirit of democracy. Intimidating your opponents, and even your allies, can quickly become counterproductive. Several NDA constituents and Sangh Parivar outfits have turned against the land ordinance. Modi is making enemies out of friends.
Going by recent elections, by-elections, and local bodies polls in different states, the enthusiasm witnessed for Modi last year has all but vanished. The BJP proved incapable of repeating its Lok Sabha performance in vote-shares/seats even in favourable situations like Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh. The edge it established in parts of West Bengal, including Kolkata, has already eroded.
What’s becoming obvious now is the effect of the thinness of the original support for Modi. He won 31 percent of the vote, but 52 percent of the Lok Sabha’s seats, the highest disproportion ever. His support was highly concentrated in a handful of states – thanks to planned communal violence and polarisation along caste and class lines.
Another factor was his high-octane multi-billion dollar election campaign, which hyped up Gujarat’s at-best-modest social indicators as major achievements. A CSDS-Lokniti poll asked people which state they thought was India’s most developed: 64 percent answered Gujarat, only four percent said Maharashtra, and even fewer cited Kerala, India’s indisputably most socially developed state.
This illusion, partly based on the search for a messiah, is breaking down. People are realising that the ‘56-inch-chest’ man is a hollow caricature of his bloated image. Modi’s troubles are set to worsen.
The writer, a former newspaper editor, is a researcher and rights activist based in Delhi.
Email: prafulbidwai1@yahoo.co.in