Commenting on US President Donald Trump’s decision to pull out of Syria and withdraw half of the 14,000 US troops in Afghanistan, veteran American commentator and author Patrick Buchanan raises some pertinent questions.
Effectively demolishing the various Republican and neocon ‘theories’ or excuses to invade Afghanistan and Iraq and ‘intervene’ in Libya and other hotspots, the Republican politician who has served in three US administrations, asks: “the price of all these interventions for the US? Some 7,000 dead, 40,000 wounded and trillions of dollars. For the Arab and Muslim world, the cost has been far greater.
“Hundreds of thousands of dead in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and Libya, civilian and soldier alike, pogroms against Christians, massacres, and millions uprooted and driven from their homes. How has all this invading, bombing and killing made the Middle East a better place or Americans more secure?”
After bombing Afghanistan and Iraq back to the Stone Age, in the words of the then US secretary of state Colin Powell, and a more than a million casualties in the Levant, the US still cannot explain why and what it has managed to achieve at the end of the day.
Washington has been in earnest negotiations with the Taliban, the former rulers of Afghanistan who are long condemned as the source of all evil, to hand back power or at least persuade them to share power with Washington’s friends and allies. The UAE has hosted several rounds of negotiations between the US and the Taliban, with the blessings of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
This after years of demonising and abusing Pakistan for allegedly supporting and being ‘soft’ on the Taliban. Only months ago, a frustrated Trump scrapped US military aid to Islamabad, complaining that Pakistan doesn’t ‘do a damn thing for us’. Remember the endless lectures to Pakistan to “do more” in America’s endless war on terror.
However, after 17 years in the country long feared as the graveyard of empires, Uncle Sam seems to have finally come to his senses and appears in an unseemly hurry to “cut and run”, leaving his friends and allies in a tizzy.
In Iraq, after totally obliterating a country celebrated as the cradle of civilisation and the birthplace of patriarch Abraham, revered by Jews, Christians and Muslims as the progenitor of their prophets, under various pretexts, the coalition of the willing appears keen to declare ‘mission accomplished’ and get out.
By eliminating Saddam Hussain, the US has wittingly or unwittingly managed to empower the folks who report next door to Iran – the very people the successive US administrations have portrayed as the “clear and present danger” to the region.
Of course, the fate of the voiceless Sunni minority ever crops up in discussions about the future of Iraq. Incidentally, it was the persecution and dispossession of Iraq’s Sunnis that actually gave birth to Daesh or the so-called Islamic State.
In Syria, the situation is even more bizarre and confusing. The swift departure of the US from the Syrian swamp hands a resounding victory to Bashar al-Assad and the Russians and Iranians, his loyal and steadfast friends who have stuck with him through the thick and thin of one of history’s bloodiest conflicts.
In any case, except for some pockets here and there, much of the popular resistance against the Syrian regime has exhausted itself, thanks to the indifference of the world community and the murderous crackdown by the regime. In any case, the US and other world powers had never been serious and sincere in their support to the Syrian people when they rose in revolt against the tyrant in 2011 in unprecedented protests.
All energies and resources had been focused on helping the Kurds who were seen as advancing their own strategic interests in the name of fighting Isis. If the West had indeed genuinely supported the resistance, this conflict would have ended long ago, along with the brutal regime.
Today, if Assad has the last laugh celebrating his ‘victory’ standing atop the mountain of half a million dead Syrians, credit should go to both the Russians and Iranians and the West. Half a million people dead and half of the country’s population rendered homeless, not to mention the total devastation of Syria, including its great ancient cities such as Aleppo.
As in Iraq, Syria boasts one of the oldest civilisations, with Damascus being the oldest, continually inhabited city and capital in the world. All that has been lost and squandered forever. For what?
Who is to be held accountable for this epic tragedy and what have they managed to achieve? Do the self-anointed champions of civilisation and democracy have any answers? It is as if one great Muslim country and civilisation after another is being annihilated according to a design. I am not a fan of conspiracy theories, but I do see a clear method in the madness.
So, it is just as well that Trump has decided to put an end to the nightmarish farce in Syria and Afghanistan. Indeed, this is perhaps the sanest decision taken as yet by the man seen by much of the US establishment as a mercurial ‘mad king’.
Even Washington’s allies in the region seem to have realised the futility of this conflict and have begun acknowledging the change of mood in Washington.
After a surprise visit to Damascus by Sudanese President Omar Al-Bashir, apparently at the behest of the Arab League, Arab countries appear keen to move on. Clearly at the instance of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the UAE, the league has talked of welcoming Syria back into the regional grouping. So let’s just say all is forgiven and forgotten.
Meanwhile, Trump has talked of the Saudis helping with the reconstruction of Syria. As has been the case in a war-ravaged Afghanistan, both the West and Russia and its allies have been salivating over the massive investment potential and business opportunity that the rebuilding of a ruined Syria represents. So maybe there is a reason why these ancient Arab and Muslim countries are pulverised in the name of some lofty excuse or the other.
While the Arab and Muslim countries are encouraged to spend all their energies and resources in plotting and fighting against each other and bleeding each other into extinction, with the help of arms manufactured and provided by you-know-who, it is the global powers that have the last laugh.
After all, it is their coffers that are filling up and bursting at the seams with wealth that once belonged to their victims. A simple game, you would think. Yet, it is played again and again with the same deadly effect without its victims ever being any the wiser.
The writer is an award-winning journalist and editor.
Email: Aijaz.syed@hotmail.com
Twitter: @AijazZaka
There is no information if rowdy Pakistanis involved in such incidents were actually dual nationals
This year alone, US Treasury would have to roll-over $10 to $14 trillion in maturing short-term debt
Tear gas no longer marks just protest sites; it paints entire cities as battlegrounds but then again, PTI did it first
Political structures and governance systems have been central to economic and social development
It is confirmed now 40 Pakistanis had died after boat of migrants had capsized in sea near Greece
Many people believe that in future, AI will play an even more significant role in their lives