No amendments needed in law on SC’s jurisdiction: law minister
ISLAMABAD: No amendments should be made to Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, which allows the Supreme Court to intervene to enforce the fundamental rights and to initiate suo motu proceedings on the violations of law, said Minister for Law Farogh Naseem.
While speaking on Geo News’ show Geo Parliament, the federal law minister also suggested the right to appeal should not be given to respondents in suo motu cases. Moreover, he added, the top court also has the authority to use the executive powers. The law minister also spoke on the accountability laws, saying the new government would not strip the National Accountability Bureau of its authority but would instead strengthen it. He added they have also drafted a law to bring back the money earned through illegal means in Pakistan and then transferred to foreign bank accounts.
About the transfer and removal of judges, the minister said amendments are needed in the relevant laws. He said procedure to remove judges on misconduct should be changed. Naseem reiterated his stance on treason case against former president General (retd) Pervez Musharraf, saying he did not have any documents on the matter and has also informed Prime Minister Imran Khan about the same. Earlier, during a meeting, the law minister had refused to comment when asked a question regarding Musharraf.
Regarding the case against Indian spy Kulbhushan Jadhav, Naseem said they are fighting it with full force in the International Court of Justice. Commander Jadhav--an Indian navy officer working for Indian covert agency Research and Analysis Wing (RAW)--was arrested on March 3, 2016, from Balochistan after he entered Pakistan from Iran. Jadhav was tried in a military court which sentenced him to death for espionage and subversive activities.
In a reaction to the move, Pakistan’s relations with neighbouring India tensed, and New Delhi approached the ICJ to hear the case. On May 18, 2017, the ICJ ordered Pakistan to halt the execution of Jadhav until a final decision was made in the proceedings.
-
‘Stingy’ Harry, Meghan Markle Crack Open A Chasm Despite Donation: ‘Do So At Your Own Peril’ -
Research Explores How TikTok’s Recommendation System May Influence Teen Beliefs -
Google Wins Approval To Export South Korea’s High-precision Maps After 20 Years—With Strict Conditions -
King Charles’ Health Battle: What Has Been Revealed About His Cancer So Far -
Bad Bunny Tugs At People’s Heartstrings With A Generous Act Of Love: ‘Our Staff Didn't Even Realize’ -
Paramount Wins Warner Bros. Bidding War As Netflix Abandons Deal: Here’s Why -
Cardi B Finally Responds To Accusations About Destroying 'SNL' Set After Nicki Minaj Joke -
Gorton And Denton By-election Result: Green Party Defeats Labour In Blow To Keir Starmer -
Jack Dorsey Cuts 4,000 Roles, Says AI Requires Smaller Teams -
Reggie Bannister Health Takes ‘difficult Turn’ Amid Dementia, Parkinson’s Battle -
'Humble Traitor' Rob Rausch Makes Unexpected Move After Betraying Maura Higgins In Season 4 -
Sarah Ferguson Drops An Accusation Against Andrew? ‘He Just Wants Leverage’ -
Anthropic Rejects Pentagon Military AI Proposal, Holds Firm On Safety Guardrails —What’s Next? -
'Traitors' Reunion Drama: Rob Rausch Defends Strategy, Makes Shocking Revelation After Victory -
Inside Hillary Clinton’s Epstein Testimony: Key Takeaways And Highlights Explained -
'Too Hard To Be Without’: Woman Testifies Against Instagram And YouTube