PHC directs Revenue Dept to submit record
Official residences
By our correspondents
April 21, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Monday directed the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Revenue and Estate Department to submit record of residences allotted to officers in the provincial metropolis to find out if the allotments were made on merit or not.
A two-member bench comprising Justice Roohul Amin Khan and Justice Syed Afsar Shah directed the Estate Department to submit the complete record before next hearing on April 23.
“We want to know how the official houses are being allotted. Some officers have been waiting for years and some have got houses within months,” Justice Roohul Amin Khan observed while hearing a writ petition in which the high court’s stenographer Altaf Hussain sought allotment of house to him in the city.
His lawyer Asif Ali Shah submitted before the bench that the petitioner had applied for allotment of the house about five years ago. He said some officers had reached retirement age waiting to get a house and termed such an attitude unjust and discriminatory.
Assistant Advocate General Sikandar Ali Shah submitted before the bench that the petitioner’s name was in the waiting list and would have to wait for his turn as per policy. The bench rejected the Estate Department’s comments and directed the official to submit complete record of houses allotted in the provincial metropolis.
Meanwhile, the same bench also sought reply from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government to explain why it did not implement its own policy on appointment of CT and SST teachers in the Education Department.
The bench asked the provincial government to reply within 14 days in a writ petition filed by Akbar Ali and others against non-implementation of the provincial government’s policy about the teachers’ appointments.
The petitioner’s lawyer Saifullah Khalil submitted before the bench that in 2010 the provincial government had adopted a new policy for the appointment of CT and SST teachers. He said the government had started four-year programme called Assistant Degree in Education (ADE) equivalent to B.A. degree and Master’s Degree in Education (MDE) equivalent to M.Sc.
He said that in 2014 the provincial government advertised the posts, but completely ignored the petitioners who had got ADE and MDE under the new programme.The court had already stayed the appointments of CT and SST teachers in the case.
A two-member bench comprising Justice Roohul Amin Khan and Justice Syed Afsar Shah directed the Estate Department to submit the complete record before next hearing on April 23.
“We want to know how the official houses are being allotted. Some officers have been waiting for years and some have got houses within months,” Justice Roohul Amin Khan observed while hearing a writ petition in which the high court’s stenographer Altaf Hussain sought allotment of house to him in the city.
His lawyer Asif Ali Shah submitted before the bench that the petitioner had applied for allotment of the house about five years ago. He said some officers had reached retirement age waiting to get a house and termed such an attitude unjust and discriminatory.
Assistant Advocate General Sikandar Ali Shah submitted before the bench that the petitioner’s name was in the waiting list and would have to wait for his turn as per policy. The bench rejected the Estate Department’s comments and directed the official to submit complete record of houses allotted in the provincial metropolis.
Meanwhile, the same bench also sought reply from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government to explain why it did not implement its own policy on appointment of CT and SST teachers in the Education Department.
The bench asked the provincial government to reply within 14 days in a writ petition filed by Akbar Ali and others against non-implementation of the provincial government’s policy about the teachers’ appointments.
The petitioner’s lawyer Saifullah Khalil submitted before the bench that in 2010 the provincial government had adopted a new policy for the appointment of CT and SST teachers. He said the government had started four-year programme called Assistant Degree in Education (ADE) equivalent to B.A. degree and Master’s Degree in Education (MDE) equivalent to M.Sc.
He said that in 2014 the provincial government advertised the posts, but completely ignored the petitioners who had got ADE and MDE under the new programme.The court had already stayed the appointments of CT and SST teachers in the case.
-
What You Need To Know About Ischemic Stroke -
Shocking Reason Behind Type 2 Diabetes Revealed By Scientists -
SpaceX Cleared For NASA Crew-12 Launch After Falcon 9 Review -
Meghan Markle Gives Old Hollywood Vibes In New Photos At Glitzy Event -
Simple 'finger Test' Unveils Lung Cancer Diagnosis -
Groundbreaking Treatment For Sepsis Emerges In New Study -
Roblox Blocked In Egypt Sparks Debate Over Child Safety And Digital Access -
Savannah Guthrie Addresses Ransom Demands Made By Her Mother Nancy's Kidnappers -
OpenAI Reportedly Working On AI-powered Earbuds As First Hardware Product -
Andrew, Sarah Ferguson Refuse King Charles Request: 'Raising Eyebrows Inside Palace' -
Adam Sandler Reveals How Tom Cruise Introduced Him To Paul Thomas Anderson -
Washington Post CEO William Lewis Resigns After Sweeping Layoffs -
North Korea To Hold 9th Workers’ Party Congress In Late February -
All You Need To Know Guide To Rosacea -
Princess Diana's Brother 'handed Over' Althorp House To Marion And Her Family -
Trump Mobile T1 Phone Resurfaces With New Specs, Higher Price