Kenya massacre

The figure was a blow that sent one’s senses reeling. I was expecting a high number but 147 left me numb - 147 lives brutally snuffed out in a horrific, day-long orgy of killing. It is almost too much to grapple with, to ponder.
Yet ponder it we must. For even as Cabinet Secretary for Internal Security Joseph Ole Nkaissery solemnly announced the number that would make this the worst terrorist attack on Kenyan soil in nearly two decades, questions were already forming about whether this was just the latest in a series of eminently preventable terrorist atrocities that have now claimed more than 350 lives in the last two years.
The attack had begun about 16 hours before Nkaissery’s announcement. By the time most Kenyans were getting the news, a coordinated response by the Kenya police and the Kenya Defence Forces was already under way and for once the security forces seemed to have learnt the lessons from the shambolic responses to previous attacks.
Unlike the attacks in Mpeketoni in June 2014 in which more than 60 people were killed, it did not take more than six hours for security agencies to arrive. Reports suggest a KDF unit was on the ground within an hour.
In contrast with the confused response to the September 2013 attack on the upmarket Westgate Shopping Mall in Nairobi, the coordination between police and military units seemed much smoother. Certainly the media statements were much better choreographed. But the differences end there.
Like most other attacks, there was prior warning that this might happen. Along with other universities in Nairobi, the Garissa University College had warned students about a possible attack and police presence there had been doubled to four officers.
Further, though it boggles the imagination that four gunmen could hold off our elite counterterror police and military units for many hours while systematically massacring ‘hostages’, it is hardly unprecedented.
Pretty much the same thing happened at

Westgate where four gunmen supposedly kept hundreds of cops and soldiers at bay for four days, apparently taking time off to pray and relax while the security agents looted the mall.
Following that attack, the government responded with a crackdown that targeted the ethnic Somali population within Nairobi which was little more than an exercise in scapegoating and extortion. Similarly, Garissa itself, which is populated mainly by ethnic Somalis, has been the site for ‘security operations’, the favoured official euphemism for collective punishment, for well over half a century.
One such operation in 1980 resulted in an estimated 3,000 deaths. Two years ago, a week into the Kenyatta presidency, another security operation saw the indiscriminate arrest of over 600 Garissa residents by a security team the government itself had described as ‘rotten’.
Even worse, last year, under the pretext of responding to terror attacks, the government forced through parliament draconian legislation to curtail fundamental rights to privacy, expression and a fair trial, which was subsequently ruled unconstitutional by the courts.
Similarly, after the latest Garissa atrocity, President Kenyatta has once again responded with another directive of dubious legality, directing the police to ignore a court order that had frozen police recruitment following a corruption-riddled exercise last year.
Predictably, and as they did after Westgate, Kenya’s rapacious political elite has closed ranks to frustrate any prospect of accountability, with the leader of the opposition CORD coalition, Raila Odinga, coming out in support of the president’s directive.
So, while on the surface it may have seemed that the Kenyan government had learnt some lessons, a closer inspection reveals that this is little more than window dressing. Fundamentally, nothing has changed except the government’s ability to project change. It is still treating security primarily as a public relations issue.
On Tuesday, the president’s spokesman, Manoah Esipisu, was asked about his boss’ promise in the aftermath of the Westgate attacks to institute a comprehensive inquiry into the security failures. He said that the president had concluded that a parliamentary committee report (which parliament itself threw out as incompetent) and a forensic audit (which no one has seen) had provided all there was to know about it.
In truth, the president had deemed the country’s security less important than the egos and jobs of his top security officials. If you want to understand why 147 people died at the hands of terrorists two days later, and why for the last two years Kenyans have continued to regularly perish in large numbers at the hands of terrorists, that tells you everything you need to know.
Excerpted from: ‘Kenya massacre: No lessons learnt from Westgate’. Courtesy: Aljazeera.com