PHC asks AG if FIA has jurisdiction over Fata
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Monday put on notice the Attorney General of Pakistan to explain whether the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) has the power and jurisdiction to investigate matters related to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).A single bench of Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel issued the
By Akhtar Amin
March 31, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Monday put on notice the Attorney General of Pakistan to explain whether the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) has the power and jurisdiction to investigate matters related to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).
A single bench of Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel issued the notice to the Attorney General in response to an appeal by Additional Chief Secretary (ACS) of Fata. He had challenged the intervention of the FIA and investigation into the affairs of Fata. The former ACS Fata, Dr Tashfeen Khan, had filed the appeal against the directives issued by the Special Judge (Central) of Anti-Corruption. The judge had asked the ACS Fata to appear before the investigation officer along with relevant record related to the investigation.
The petitioner’s lawyer, Qazi Muhammad Anwar, submitted before the bench that the FIA Act 1974 was not extended to Fata. He submitted that the FIA had no power and jurisdiction to intervene and investigate the affairs related to Fata unless and until the act was extended.
He submitted that currently the FIA cannot assume its jurisdiction in Fata and thus the act of the FIA to investigate the affairs of Fata was illegal and against the law. A standing counsel for the federal government, FM Sabir, submitted before the bench that the appeal against the order of the Special Judge (Central) of Anti-Corruption was non-maintainable.
He submitted such appeals could be filed for conviction and in this case there was an order for investigation into alleged corruption. The bench asked the petitioner’s lawyer to explain at the next hearing whether or not the appeal was maintainable.
He said that under Section 94 of Criminal Procedure Code the FIA had taken notice of the embezzlement in funds provide by the federal government to Fata administration for maintaining peace and security and checking cattle smuggling from Pakistan to Afghanistan and auctioning the smuggled cattle.
Later, the FIA filed a complaint against the ACS Fata. The Special Judge (Central) Anti-Corruption rejected the objection raised by the ACS Fata that FIA had no jurisdiction. He passed an order on March 1, 2013 and directed the ACS Fata to appear before the IO, Shahid Ilyas of FIA along with all relevant record before March 8, 2013. However, the ACS Fata moved the high court which restrained the FIA from investigating the matter.
A single bench of Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel issued the notice to the Attorney General in response to an appeal by Additional Chief Secretary (ACS) of Fata. He had challenged the intervention of the FIA and investigation into the affairs of Fata. The former ACS Fata, Dr Tashfeen Khan, had filed the appeal against the directives issued by the Special Judge (Central) of Anti-Corruption. The judge had asked the ACS Fata to appear before the investigation officer along with relevant record related to the investigation.
The petitioner’s lawyer, Qazi Muhammad Anwar, submitted before the bench that the FIA Act 1974 was not extended to Fata. He submitted that the FIA had no power and jurisdiction to intervene and investigate the affairs related to Fata unless and until the act was extended.
He submitted that currently the FIA cannot assume its jurisdiction in Fata and thus the act of the FIA to investigate the affairs of Fata was illegal and against the law. A standing counsel for the federal government, FM Sabir, submitted before the bench that the appeal against the order of the Special Judge (Central) of Anti-Corruption was non-maintainable.
He submitted such appeals could be filed for conviction and in this case there was an order for investigation into alleged corruption. The bench asked the petitioner’s lawyer to explain at the next hearing whether or not the appeal was maintainable.
He said that under Section 94 of Criminal Procedure Code the FIA had taken notice of the embezzlement in funds provide by the federal government to Fata administration for maintaining peace and security and checking cattle smuggling from Pakistan to Afghanistan and auctioning the smuggled cattle.
Later, the FIA filed a complaint against the ACS Fata. The Special Judge (Central) Anti-Corruption rejected the objection raised by the ACS Fata that FIA had no jurisdiction. He passed an order on March 1, 2013 and directed the ACS Fata to appear before the IO, Shahid Ilyas of FIA along with all relevant record before March 8, 2013. However, the ACS Fata moved the high court which restrained the FIA from investigating the matter.
-
50 Cent Super Bowl Ad Goes Viral -
'The Housemaid' Lifts Company's Profits: Here's How -
Michael Douglas Recalls Director's Harsh Words Over 'Wall Street' Performance -
Henry Czerny On Steve Martin Created Humor On 'Pink Panther' Set -
Lady Victoria Hervey: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's Ex-girlfriend Proud Of Being On Epstein Files -
Dolly Parton Created One Of Her Iconic Tracks With Acrylic Nails? -
Parents Alarmed As Teens Form Emotional Bonds With AI Companion Chatbots -
Denzel Washington Surprises LeBron James -
Cillian Murphy's Hit Romantic Drama Exits Prime Video: Here's Why -
Paris Hilton Reveals What Keeps Her Going In Crazy Schedule -
Deep Freeze Returning To Northeastern United States This Weekend: 'Dangerous Conditions' -
Inside Dylan Efron's First 'awful' Date With Girlfriend Courtney King -
'Sugar' Season 2: Colin Farrell Explains What Lies Ahead After THAT Plot Twist -
‘Revolting’ Sarah Ferguson Crosses One Line That’s Sealed Her Fate As Well As Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s -
AI Rivalry Heats Up As Anthropic Targets OpenAI In Super Bowl Ad -
Kate Middleton, Prince William Share Message Ahead Of Major Clash