Al-Azizia reference: Wajid submits details of cheques received by Maryam from Nawaz
ISLAMABAD: The joint investigation team (JIT) head Wajid Zia Friday continued with his statement in Al-Azizia/Hill Metal Establishment corruption reference amid a strained environment between prosecution and the defence.
Counsel for Nawaz Sharif Khawaja Haris was raising objections over the admissibility and relevance of the documents that Wajid Zia had been producing. The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Deputy Prosecutor General (DPG) Sardar Muzaffar Abbasi had been contending that the defence counsel not letting the statement complete with his objections over every sentence of the witness.
It is to be mentioned here that previously, when Khawaja Haris was cross-examining Wajid Zia and Investigation Officer (IO) Imran Dogar in Avenfield apartments corruption reference, the NAB DPG was consistently raising objections, insisting that these objections must be recorded and on that particular time, Haris was complaining about the inappropriate attitude to the prosecution.
During Friday’s proceedings, Wajid Zia produced before the court cheques that Nawaz Sharif received from Hussain Nawaz and Hill Metal Establishment Jeddah and also cheques he gave to his daughter Maryam Nawaz.
Wajid Zia also produced a letter of Qatari Prince Hamad bin Jasim that he had written to the JIT. The letter was made part of the judicial record. The prosecution also sought the court’s permission to submit some documents that came in response to the JIT’s mutual legal assistance applications to the UAE authorities.
Khawaja Haris however objected that these documents are not part of the reference. A NAB prosecutor Malik Wasiq sought the court’s permission to submit four cheques of the Standard Chartered Bank as evidence. Khawaja Haris said Zia had never been custodian to that record and he also did not execute those cheques. He said producing the same before the court would be a futile exercise.
Initially when Zia started recording of his evidence, he took a start from the statements of Hussain Nawaz, Hassan Nawaz and Maryam Nawaz that they had submitted before the Supreme Court.
-
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Faces Future With UK MPs, Says Expert -
Shamed Andrew Told 'nobody Is Above The Law' Amid Harrowing Silence -
Gisele Bundchen Melts Hearts With Sweet Bike Ride Glimpse Featuring Son -
Prince William Found Meghan Markle ‘quite Refreshing’ At Start -
Kate Middleton Knew Should Could Not Be ‘voice Of Reason’ With Prince Harry -
Rihanna Has Wardrobe Malfunction At A$AP Rocky Fashion Show -
Prince Harry Felt System Had ‘one Rule For Him, One For Prince William’ -
Jake Paul's Fiancée Sends Him Over The Moon Over Stunning Victory -
Harper Beckham Sends Valentine’s Love Amid Brooklyn Family Drama -
Why Prince William, Kate Middleton 'partnership' Is Important For Monarchy -
Katie Price Drama Escalates As Family Stays In Touch With Ex JJ Slater -
Critics Target Palace Narrative After Andrew's Controversy Refuses To Die -
Sarah Ferguson’s Delusions Take A Turn For The Worse: ‘She’s Been Deserted’ -
ICE Agents 'fake Car Trouble' To Arrest Minnesota Man, Family Says -
Camila Mendes Reveals How She Prepared For Her Role In 'Idiotka' -
China Confirms Visa-free Travel For UK, Canada Nationals