The foreign minister’s decision to criticise the national security adviser for meeting the Indian High Commissioner to Pakistan in Islamabad last week was unfortunate and poorly-timed.
It was unfortunate because in addition to exposing institutional rifts within the PML-N cabinet, it suggested that podiums for cross-border hard talk are not just a Delhi fixture. It was poorly-timed because the effects of recent efforts to cool temperatures on both sides of the border are only just beginning to be felt.
A public reaffirmation by the FO and MEA to abide by the Code of Conduct 1992 for the treatment of diplomatic and consular personnel; a statement by the Indian envoy on the need to improve trade ties; and the 114th meeting of the Permanent Indus Water Commission in New Delhi to discuss matters related to the implementation of the Indus Waters Treaty, all in the span of a month, suggest the possibility of a truce – even if it is predicated on a cold peace.
The occupational hazards of a fragile dialogue process need no recounting. In India, the frequency with which politicians across the aisle have used warmongering to raise political temperatures, together with the Indian Army’s doctrine of disproportionate shelling on the LoC, has all but erased the public memory of strategic restraint.
For both countries, a troika of election cycles; the geopolitics of the US, China and Russia; and a deteriorating situation in Kashmir make a transformative bilateral overhaul before new governments are safely installed in their respective capitals unlikely.
Despite this challenge, a recent meeting of the Chaophraya Dialogue, an India-Pakistan Track-II that continues to bring policy and opinion-makers together for political engagement, agreed to a set list of recommendations for a credible minimum detente that can hold the peace.
One: the strengthening of crisis management mechanisms – including, but not limited to, regular meetings of the DGMOs; structured battalion commander-level flag meetings; and a calibrated reduction in the arms being used on the LoC – can help prevent uncontrolled escalation. Similarly, while formalising the ceasefire declarations of 2003 may not entirely inure the LoC from sporadic violence, a politically-backed agreement that validates the ceasefire could credibly buffer the relationship from political provocations and disincentivise election-trail jingoism.
Two: on the economic front, trade and business can motivate greater bilateral contact and engagement. Regular meetings of the Pakistan-India Joint Business Forum, as agreed to in the last round of dialogue between the Commerce Secretaries of the two countries, can re-energise important constituencies for a dialogue that, in due time, pivots to peace.
Some actionable steps – a reduction of tariffs by both sides; activating the sub-group on NTBs to address Pakistan’s concerns; supporting cross-LoC commerce; and considering appropriate measures for trade facilitation – can build on the September 2012 roadmap for trade connectivity. The Indian High Commissioner’s recent statement supporting the removal of non-tariff barriers, tourism and the liberalisation of visa regimes indicates an appetite in New Delhi to improve on the current figure of $5 billion that represents two-way trade.
Three: both India and Pakistan ought to recognise the inherent value of strengthening people-to-people contact in reducing cross-border suspicion and anti-neighbourly sentiments that continue to make even the mention of rapprochement politically costly. Indo-Pak relations may not find renewal in conditional diplomacy or talks about talks, but it can locate it in tangible on-the-ground change and a politically-backed rational public discourse.
The following sidebar from history is just one of several reminders that both sides must stop viewing bad relations as a historical inevitability. On former Indian prime minister Nehru’s death, the then foreign minister Bhutto ordered a plane to transport Indian journalists stationed in Pakistan back home. Pakistan went into official mourning, condolences were expressed in the National Assembly and Pakistani flags were flown at half-mast out of respect.
Today, conviviality to that extent may be difficult to imagine and even tougher to sell given the current low ebb of the bilateral equation. But that doesn’t mean that both sides can’t – or shouldn’t – shoot for a sustainable thaw.
The writer works for the Jinnah Institute and is pursuing a PhD at Yale. Twitter @fahdhumayun
There are over 11 million Pakistanis settled abroad, out of which around six million work in Gulf and Middle East
This year alone, US Treasury would have to roll-over $10 to $14 trillion in maturing short-term debt
Tear gas no longer marks just protest sites; it paints entire cities as battlegrounds but then again, PTI did it first
Political structures and governance systems have been central to economic and social development
It is confirmed now 40 Pakistanis had died after boat of migrants had capsized in sea near Greece
Many people believe that in future, AI will play an even more significant role in their lives
