I want completion of public interest works: CJP
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Mian Saqib Nisar on Friday expressed his desire to decide all the pending cases before retirement in order to avoid criticism.
Heading a two-member bench hearing a case pertaining to hike in the prices of medicines, the CJP said he wished he could decide all the pending cases before retirement otherwise adversaries will be raising slogans that ‘I made tall claims but did nothing’. The chief justice gave these remarks after the counsel for the Pharma Bureau — a representative body of multinational pharmaceuticals in Pakistan — asked for a date to be fixed for the next hearing.
The chief justice said he was in more hurry to decide the pending cases. The secretary health submitted an interim report to the bench. According to the report, there were 739 cases incorporated in Category-A, while some 710 cases had been examined. It also highlighted the cases incorporated in Category B, C and D.
The court was informed that the matter relating to fixed prices of some 390 cases would be examined in the current month. The chief justice observed that the court will decide the cases of public importance and directed submission of a complete report in the first week of May, adding he wants that all public-interest development works should be completed. The chief justice said the court would go through the report and pass an appropriate order.
Javed Akhai, a citizen, requested the court to pass an order, abolishing the taxes imposed on pharmaceutical companies. The chief justice asked the citizen if he wanted the pharmaceutical industry to be tax-free. The citizen replied in the affirmative.
At this, the chief justice said it was Parliament's prerogative to levy or abolish taxes. He said tax matters did not fall in the apex court jurisdiction and the court will move in accordance with the existing relevant laws.
The chief justice asked the citizen if he was running any campaign in this regard he should approach the parliamentarians. Later, the court adjourned further hearing until first week of May.
-
EU Leaders Divided Over ‘Buy European’ Push At Belgium Summit: How Will It Shape Europe's Volatile Economy? -
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle Issue A Statement Two Days After King Charles -
'The Masked Singer' Pays Homage To James Van Der Beek After His Death -
Elon Musk’s XAI Shake-up Amid Co-founders’ Departure: What’s Next For AI Venture? -
Prince William, King Charles Are Becoming Accessories To Andrew’s Crimes? Expert Explains Legality -
Seedance 2.0: How It Redefines The Future Of AI Sector -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Still Has A Loan To Pay Back: Heres Everything To Know -
US House Passes ‘SAVE America Act’: Key Benefits, Risks & Voter Impact Explained -
'Heartbroken' Busy Philipps Mourns Death Of Her Friend James Van Der Beek -
Gwyneth Paltrow Discusses ‘bizarre’ Ways Of Dealing With Chronic Illness -
US House Passes Resolution To Rescind Trump’s Tariffs On Canada -
Reese Witherspoon Pays Tribute To James Van Der Beek After His Death -
Halsey Explains ‘bittersweet’ Endometriosis Diagnosis -
'Single' Zayn Malik Shares Whether He Wants More Kids -
James Van Der Beek’s Family Faces Crisis After His Death -
Courteney Cox Celebrates Jennifer Aniston’s 57th Birthday With ‘Friends’ Throwback