Unfulfilled pledge: Lawyers move PHC to seek CM’s disqualification
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court Bar Association (PHCBA) on Wednesday moved the Peshawar High Court (PHC) to seek disqualification of Chief Minister Pervez Khattak for not honouring a pledge of grant.
The lawyers’ body claimed that under Articles 62 and 63 of Constitution the chief minister was no more Sadiq and Ameen as he couldn’t honour his announcement of Rs10 million grant to the Bar.
The writ petition was filed by PHCBA through its general secretary Rahmanullah Khan. Chief Minister Pervez Khattak, Chief Secretary, Secretary Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Secretary Finance and Advocate General Khyber Pakhtunkhwa were made parties in the petition. The lawyers’ body stated in the petition that the chief minister in his address to the gathering of the PHCBA had announced a special grant of Rs10 million in March 2016. It said the reports about the announcement were carried in the press.
“The petitioner (PHCBA) submitted various letters through its presidents and general secretaries to the respondent, chief minister, but no response was received from the government side,” the lawyer body claimed in the petition.
Recently, it said that a unanimous resolution was also passed by the association in its general body meeting and decided that a legal way would be adopted for the legal rights of the lawyers by filing a writ petition.
“The Chief Minister Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is not fulfilling its commitment regarding Rs10 million grant to the petitioner, he has no right/not eligible to hold the office of member provincial assembly and chief minister of the province and shall be disqualified under Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution,” the PHC Bar Association submitted in the petition.
It said that the chief minister didn’t fulfill the criteria, which was essential for the member of the provincial assembly under Article 113 of the Constitution.
It was stated that every elected member of the assembly shall be Ameen and honest under Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution and the Supreme Court also held in the famous Panama case that the elected member shall be honest and Ameen.
It was further submitted that the respondents have issued special grants of Rs3 million to Bannu Bar Association and Rs1 million to Dir Bar Association, but ignored the PHCBA, which was discrimination on the part of the respondents and violation of Article 4 and 25 of the Constitution.
The PHCBA prayed before the high court to direct the respondents to release the announced special grant
The lawyers’ body prayed for disqualification of the chief minister as member of the provincial assembly within the purview of Article 62 and 63 of the Constitution.
As interim relief, the bar association requested the court to stop the respondent, chief minister, from performing his duties and responsibilities till final decision in the petition.
-
Lana Del Rey Announces New Single Co-written With Husband Jeremy Dufrene -
Ukraine-Russia Talks Heat Up As Zelenskyy Warns Of US Pressure Before Elections -
Lil Nas X Spotted Buying Used Refrigerator After Backlash Over Nude Public Meltdown -
Caleb McLaughlin Shares His Resume For This Major Role -
King Charles Carries With ‘dignity’ As Andrew Lets Down -
Brooklyn Beckham Covers Up More Tattoos Linked To His Family Amid Rift -
Shamed Andrew Agreed To ‘go Quietly’ If King Protects Daughters -
Candace Cameron Bure Says She’s Supporting Lori Loughlin After Separation From Mossimo Giannulli -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Are ‘not Innocent’ In Epstein Drama -
Reese Witherspoon Goes 'boss' Mode On 'Legally Blonde' Prequel -
Chris Hemsworth And Elsa Pataky Open Up About Raising Their Three Children In Australia -
Record Set Straight On King Charles’ Reason For Financially Supporting Andrew And Not Harry -
Michael Douglas Breaks Silence On Jack Nicholson's Constant Teasing -
How Prince Edward Was ‘bullied’ By Brother Andrew Mountbatten Windsor -
'Kryptonite' Singer Brad Arnold Loses Battle With Cancer -
Gabourey Sidibe Gets Candid About Balancing Motherhood And Career