Penalising Nehal Hashmi bad precedent: Sanaullah
LAHORE: Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah said by penalising Nehal Hashmi despite his unconditional apology, the Supreme Court has set a bad precedent. Talking to media Thursday outside the Punjab Assembly, the minister said, “traditionally, whoever asks for an unconditional apology is forgiven”.
He recalled instances from the past when the apex court forgave individuals for contempt of court after they sought an unconditional apology. “Take Babar Awan’s example. He had openly ridiculed the judiciary but was forgiven after he sought an unconditional apology”. Nehal Hashmi also tendered an unconditional apology, but he wasn’t forgiven (by the judges),” the minister rued.
“Nehal Hashmi’s unconditional apology should have been accepted,” he opined. The apex court ordered a one-month imprisonment sentence and Rs50,000 fine as it rejected Hashmi’s appeal for pardon, earlier Thursday. The apex court also ruled that Hashmi stands disqualified from holding public office for a period of five years according to Article 63(1) (g) of the Constitution.
Sanaullah once again clarified that criticising decision of a court is the democratic right of an individual and it does not equate to maligning and disrespecting the institution of judiciary. “Nawaz Sharif accepted the Supreme Court’s verdict and stepped down. If he hadn’t accepted the decision, then it would have been contempt of court. But simply criticising the verdict is not (contempt of court)”.
World over the right to criticise a decision of the judiciary is considered basic freedom of expression, he added. Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan, meanwhile, said he wants to congratulate the Supreme Court for moving against PML-N Senator Nehal Hashmi on his abuse and threats to senior judiciary and their families. “I can assure them the whole nation stands with the SC and they should not be weighed down by the contemptuous & abusive behaviour of Sharifs & their darbaris,” he said in tweets.
Imran wrote, “we are petitioning SC for an early hearing of the case against Khawaja Asif as he is a grave security risk in the sensitive office he holds. He has a foreign domicile, works for a foreign concern, receives salary from abroad & has foreign bank accounts - all of which he did not declare”.
Meanwhile Dr Yasmin Rashid of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf tweeted: "All those who have looted, threatened, abusee and sought to use the state and its institutions against the interest of Pakistan must and will face the consequences.#NehalHashmi is just the start."
-
Keke Palmer Makes Jaw-dropping Confession About 'The Burbs' -
Cher Sparks Major Health Concerns As She Pushes Herself To Limit At 79 -
Former NYPD Detective Says Nancy Guthrie's Disappearance 'could Be Hoax' -
King Charles Publicly Asked If He Knew About Andrew's Connection To Epstein -
Jessie J Addresses Pregnancy Rumors After Sporting Belly Bump -
Channing Tatum Leaves Fans Scratching Their Heads With Message About South Korea -
Emma Roberts Stars In 'A Body In The Woods' -
'Our Estrangements Can Kill Us': Meghan's Co-star Weighs In On Anthony Hopkins Interview -
‘Tone Deaf’ Andrew Called Out Over Arrogant Behaviour Amid Epstein Scandal -
Singing, Dancing & Outperforming: Watch China’s Robot Fair Ahead Of Spring Festival 2026 -
WhatsApp Under Fire: EU Steps Up Pressure On Meta Over Claims Of Blocking AI Rivals -
Steven Van Zandt Criticizes Bad Bunny's 2026 Super Bowl Performance -
Katie Price Seen With New Hubby Lee Andrews Weeks After Tying The Knot -
Biggest Order Yet Issued Against Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor: King Charles You Have To’ -
ByteDance’s Seedance 2.0 Marks New Era Of Cinematic AI-generated Videos: Here’s How -
Struggling With Obesity? Here's How To Manage It