IHC judge reserves judgment on appeal against tribunal’s decision to send back deputation judges
Justice Arbab said judges who were elevated from high court to SC also issued reserved decisions later
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court has reserved its judgment on an appeal against the decision of the Islamabad District Judicial Service Tribunal to send back judges who came on deputation.
The court inquired the law officer to apprise it of the number of judges in Islamabad’s subordinate judiciary and judges who were working on deputation. After hearing the arguments of the parties, the court directed the amicus curiae to submit his arguments in writing.
The Islamabad High Court’s Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir heard the case against the decision of the Islamabad District Judicial Service Tribunal with regard to sending back judges who came on deputation to the subordinate judiciary.
Advocate General Islamabad Ayaz Shaukat said that when the notification of the new tribunal was issued on March 18, the old tribunal came to an end. The old tribunal issued a summary decision in the case on March 21.
The high court observed that it has to examine whether the tribunal had the authority to make that order or not. Justice Arbab Tahir said that the tribunal has written that they had already reserved the decision.
The court observed that the tribunal is equal to the civil court and the civil court does not have the authority to nullify any law. After the new notification, the tribunal, which does not exist, could not have made the order.
Justice Arbab Tahir said judges who were elevated from the high court to the Supreme Court also issued reserved decisions later.
The lawyer for the petitioner judge said that there has been a demand for the transfer of judges from Islamabad to other provinces. Judges of provinces are constantly transferred within the province, but judges of Islamabad are not transferred.
The court inquired the counsel whether he is saying problems arise due to a judge staying in one place permanently and the judge’s personal likes and dislikes are involved. It reserved the decision after hearing the arguments.
-
AI Copyright Battle: ByteDance To Curb Seedance 2.0 Amid Disney Lawsuit Warning -
Savannah Guthrie In Tears As She Makes Desperate Plea To Mom's Kidnappers -
Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy Targets 125,000 Jobs And Export Growth -
Tre Johnson, Former NFL Guard And Teacher, Passes Away At 54 -
Jerome Tang Calls Out Team After Embarrassing Home Defeat -
Cynthia Erivo Addresses Bizarre Rumour About Her Relationship With Ariana Grande -
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle Spotted Cosying Up At NBA All-Star Game -
Lady Gaga Explains How Fibromyalgia Lets Her 'connect With People Who Have It' -
Metro Detroit Weather Forecast: Is The Polar Vortex Coming Back? -
Daniel Radcliffe Reveals Surprising Way Fatherhood Changed Him -
‘Disgraced’ Andrew At Risk Of Breaking Point As Epstein Scandal Continues -
Alan Cumming Shares Plans With 2026 Bafta Film Awards -
OpenClaw Founder Peter Steinberger Hired By OpenAI As AI Agent Race Heats Up -
Kate Middleton's Reaction To Harry Stepping Back From Royal Duties Laid Bare -
Rose Byrne Continues Winning Streak After Golden Globe Awards Victory -
Ice Hockey Olympics Update: Canada Stays Unbeaten With Dominant Win Over France