Army didn’t directly file FIRs against May 9 accused: SC judge
Bench directed counsel to conclude his arguments within 30 minutes by Wednesday
ISLAMABAD: Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, a judge of the Supreme Court, observed on Tuesday that the accused in the May 9 incidents were charged under the Official Secrets Act, and the army did not directly file any FIRs.
A seven-member Constitutional Bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, heard the Intra-Court Appeals (ICAs) filed by the federal government and the Ministry of Defence against its earlier judgement declaring the trial of civilians in military courts unconstitutional. Other members of the bench were Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Musarrat Hilali, Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan, Justice Syed Hassan Azhar Rizvi, and Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan.
Khwaja Haris, counsel for the Ministry of Defence, continued his rebuttal arguments. The bench directed the counsel to conclude his arguments within 30 minutes by Wednesday.
Justice Aminuddin noted that the attorney general would be heard on Wednesday after Khwaja Haris concludes his submissions. During the hearing, Justice Mazhar observed that the Army Act also grants certain fundamental rights, adding that Rangers and FC personnel approach the service tribunal if dismissed.
Justice Mandokhail questioned whether police and Rangers have their own separate courts. “In the police, does the IG hear appeals, or does the SP conduct cases?” Justice Mandokhail asked, adding that in India, independent forums are available.
He emphasized that a person cannot be arrested without an FIR nor detained without a magistrate’s order. Justice Mazhar, however, noted that the accused in the May 9 incidents were charged under the Official Secrets Act. “The army did not file any FIRs directly,” Justice Mazhar remarked, adding that civilians were handed over to the military through anti-terrorism courts. “Whether the custody was correct or not is another debate,” he observed.
Justice Mandokhail remarked that the case would have far-reaching consequences, citing that the F B Ali case was still debated decades later. Meanwhile, Khawaja Haris submitted that if there had been fewer questions from the judges, he would have finished his arguments on Tuesday. Mandokhail promised he won’t ask any more questions.
Later, the court adjourned the hearing for today (Wednesday).
-
Camila Mendes Reveals How She Prepared For Her Role In 'Idiotka' -
China Confirms Visa-free Travel For UK, Canada Nationals -
Inside Sarah Ferguson, Andrew Windsor's Emotional Collapse After Epstein Fallout -
Bad Bunny's Star Power Explodes Tourism Searches For His Hometown -
Jennifer Aniston Gives Peek Into Love Life With Cryptic Snap Of Jim Curtis -
Prince Harry Turns Diana Into Content: ‘It Would Have Appalled Her To Be Repackaged For Profit’ -
Prince William's Love For His Three Children Revealed During Family Crisis -
Murder Suspect Kills Himself After Woman Found Dead In Missouri -
Sarah Ferguson's Plea To Jeffrey Epstein Exposed In New Files -
Prince William Prepares For War Against Prince Harry: Nothing Is Off The Table Not Legal Ways Or His Influence -
'How To Get Away With Murder' Star Karla Souza Is Still Friends With THIS Costar -
Pal Reveals Prince William’s ‘disorienting’ Turmoil Over Kate’s Cancer: ‘You Saw In His Eyes & The Way He Held Himself’ -
Poll Reveals Majority Of Americans' Views On Bad Bunny -
Wiz Khalifa Thanks Aimee Aguilar For 'supporting Though Worst' After Dad's Death -
Man Convicted After DNA Links Him To 20-year-old Rape Case -
Royal Expert Shares Update In Kate Middleton's Relationship With Princess Eugenie, Beatrice