State busy making, breaking govts: Justice Minallah
Judge passes these remarks during hearing of a bail application in a murder case
ISLAMABAD: Supreme Court Judge Justice Athar Minallah Friday remarked that the state was busy making and breaking governments, while all the institutions were hounding the political opponents.
The judge passed these remarks during the hearing of a bail application in a murder case.
A three-member bench — headed by Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail — heard the bail application.
Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan were the two other bench members.
Justice Minallah said the Supreme Court spoke the truth as much as the entire society adding that the murder of an elected prime minister had been admitted after 40 years; therefore, someone should have been declared responsible and punished.
He observed that the instant bail matter had been pending with the apex court since 2017, while the state was busy bringing and removing governments while all the institutions were hounding the political opponents.
Justice Mandokhail remarked that three prime ministers had been killed but what happened to their cases.
He observed that one of the most senior judges was also killed in Balochistan but nothing was known adding that the main thing was the lack of desire to do anything.
He further observed that as compared to the other two provinces, police investigation was very poor in Sindh and Punjab.
“As long as the state institutions will remain engaged in political engineering, the situation will remain the same,” Justice Mandokhail remarked.
Justice Minallah observed that if the constitution was followed, such situations won’t happen.
Justice Mandokhail remarked that people did not trust the institutions and wanted the Supreme Court to do all the work.
“What could be a greater crime than the murder of a prime minister?” Justice Minallah asked, saying someone should have been held responsible and punished.
Justice Malik Shahzad Ahmad Khan remarked that in a country where the prime minister faced such a situation, what would happen to the common man.
He further remarked that that one day the prime minister was in the Prime Minister’s House and the next day he landed in jail.
“No one knows how many days the prime minister has to stay”, the judge remarked.
Meanwhile, the court rejected the bail application of the accused, Ishaq, and directed his arrest.
-
Czech Republic Supports Social Media Ban For Under-15 -
Prince William Ready To End 'shielding' Of ‘disgraced’ Andrew Amid Epstein Scandal -
Chris Hemsworth Hailed By Halle Berry For Sweet Gesture -
Blac Chyna Reveals Her New Approach To Love, Healing After Recent Heartbreak -
Royal Family's Approach To Deal With Andrew Finally Revealed -
Super Bowl Weekend Deals Blow To 'Melania' Documentary's Box Office -
Meghan Markle Shares Glitzy Clips From Fifteen Percent Pledge Gala -
Melissa Jon Hart Explains Rare Reason Behind Not Revisting Old Roles -
Meghan Markle Eyeing On ‘Queen’ As Ultimate Goal -
Japan Elects Takaichi As First Woman Prime Minister After Sweeping Vote -
Kate Middleton Insists She Would Never Undermine Queen Camilla -
King Charles 'terrified' Andrew's Scandal Will End His Reign -
Winter Olympics 2026: Lindsey Vonn’s Olympic Comeback Ends In Devastating Downhill Crash -
Adrien Brody Opens Up About His Football Fandom Amid '2026 Super Bowl' -
Barbra Streisand's Obsession With Cloning Revealed -
What Did Olivia Colman Tell Her Husband About Her Gender?