Imran not produced via video link; ECP seeks jail authorities’ response
ECP officials say all arrangements had been completed on their part
ISLAMABAD: The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Tuesday sought an explanation from the Adiala Jail authorities for failing to produce PTI founder chairman Imran Khan via video link in a contempt case despite clear directives.
During the hearing, Imran Khan’s lawyer Faisal Chaudhry argued before a three-member ECP bench led by Sindh Member Nisar Ahmad Durrani that the jail authorities’ non-cooperation amounted to contempt of court proceedings.
The contempt case, initiated by the electoral body in August 2022, alleges that the PTI founder had committed contempt against the ECP and the chief election commissioner through his statements during various media talks and interviews.
Faisal Chaudhry informed the bench that the ECP had previously ordered Imran Khan to appear via video link.
At this point, member Sindh inquired whether arrangements for the video link had been made.
Responding to the query, ECP officials said that all arrangements had been completed on their part. However, they said that the video link had yet to be activated from the jail despite ECP staff being deputed there for this purpose. The officials accused the jail authorities of non-cooperation in this regard.
Faisal Chaudhry claimed that Imran Khan would likely not be allowed to appear via video link due to an “unannounced ban” on broadcasting his image and statements. He urged the commission to summon Imran Khan physically if the video link could not be activated.
The ECP lawyer suggested that there might have been a technical issue and that the non-appearance did not appear deliberate. He said that the accused’s absence precluded the recording of evidence.
In response, Faisal Chaudhry said, “Actions depend on intentions; let the commission drop the case and move on.”
However, member Sindh reminded the lawyer, “You are fighting the case; how can it be dropped?”
The election commission directed the jail authorities to submit a response and adjourned the hearing until January 15.
-
Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton Make First Public Appearance As A Couple At Super Bowl 2026 -
Romeo And Cruz Beckham Subtly Roast Brooklyn With New Family Tattoos -
Meghan Markle Called Out For Unturthful Comment About Queen Curtsy -
Bad Bunny Headlines Super Bowl With Hits, Dancers And Celebrity Guests -
Insiders Weigh In On Kim Kardashian And Lewis Hamilton's Relationship -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Private Time At Posh French Location Laid Bare -
Stefon Diggs Family Explained: How Many Children The Patriots Star Has And With Whom -
‘Narcissist’ Andrew Still Feels ‘invincible’ After Exile -
Shamed Andrew ‘mental State’ Under Scrutiny Amid Difficult Time -
Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Halftime Show: What Time Will He Perform Tonight? -
Where Is Super Bowl 2026 Taking Place? Everything To Know About The NFL Showdown -
Chris Pratt Explains Why He And Katherine Schwarzenegger Did Premarital Counseling -
Drake 'turns Down' Chance To Hit Back At Kendrick Lamar At Super Bowl -
Sarah Ferguson Had A ‘psychosexual Network’ With Jeffrey Epstein -
Miranda Kerr Shares The One Wellness Practice She Does With Her Kids -
Czech Republic Supports Social Media Ban For Under-15