Justice Wiqar recuses himself from election petitions
Justice Wiqar clarifies that once a judge took an oath of office, any prior political affiliations were nullified
PESHAWAR: Justice Wiqar Ahmad, the judge of the Election Tribunal at the Peshawar High Court, has recused himself from hearing all election petitions, citing objections raised against him.
The petitions have been returned to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for further proceedings.
In a three-page written order, Justice Wiqar Ahmad stated that he could no longer hear the election cases and had formally withdrawn himself from them.
The order also addressed the objections raised by the complainant, who argued that Justice Wiqar Ahmad had previously been a member of the Insaf Lawyers Forum and served as Additional Advocate General during the PTI-led government.
Justice Wiqar Ahmad clarified in his written judgement that once a judge took an oath of office, any prior political affiliations were nullified.
He emphasised that as a judge, he had always decided cases impartially, without fear or favour. However, considering the objection raised, he deemed it appropriate to withdraw from hearing the petitions. The written order has directed the Election Commission to transfer these cases to another tribunal for adjudication. Among the high-profile cases under Justice Wiqar Ahmad’s tribunal were those involving former provincial minister Taimur Jhagra, Abbas Afridi, Amjad Afridi, Ali Zaman, and Hamidul Haq.
The objections were brought forward by PTI-Parliamentarians MPA Arbab Waseem, who questioned Justice Wiqar Ahmad’s impartiality.
The tribunal’s decision has been formally communicated to the Election Commission, and all petitions have been ordered to be transferred to a new tribunal for further hearings.
The objections were brought forward by PTI-Parliamentarians MPA Arbab Waseem, who questioned Justice Wiqar Ahmad’s impartiality. The tribunal’s decision has been formally communicated to the Election Commission, and all petitions have been ordered to be transferred to a new tribunal for further hearings.
-
Sweden's Princess Sofia Explains Why She Was Named In Epstein Files -
Activist Shocks Fellow Conservatives: 'Bad Bunny Is Winner' -
Noel Gallagher Challenges Critics Of Award Win To Face Him In Person -
Minnesota Man Charged After $350m IRS Tax Scam Exposed -
Meghan Markle 'terrified' Over Possible UK Return -
Did Opiate Restrictions Lead To Blake Garrett's Death? -
Royal Expert Reflects On Princess Eugenie, Beatrice 'priorities' Amid Strained Relationship With Sarah, Andrew -
Prince William's 'concerning' Statement About Andrew Is Not Enough? -
50 Cent Gets Called Out Over Using Slur For Cardi B -
Scientists Discover Rare Form Of 'magnets' That Might Surprise You -
Nancy Guthrie’s Kidnapper Will Be Caught Soon: Here’s Why -
AI Innovation Could Make Trade Secrets More Valuable Than Patents, Says Billionaire Investor -
King Charles Heckling: Calls For 10 BAFTAs And A Knighthood For Sign Language Interpreter -
Royal Expert On Andrew, Sarah Ferguson’s ‘entitled’ Behaviour Since Marriage -
Kim Kardashian Leaves Meghan Markle 'upset' With Latest 'cheap Shot' -
Instagram And YouTube Accused Of Engineering Addiction In Children’s Brains