ISLAMABAD: Between October 10 and November 15, 2024, election tribunals across Pakistan decided another 20 petitions, bringing the total of decided petitions to 60, or 17 percent of the 350 election results disputes systematically tracked by FAFEN.
However, seven of the 23 tribunals have yet to decide on any petitions. The FAFEN has identified and tracked 350 out of 377 petitions filed with the 23 tribunals. While there is marginal improvement in the pace of petition disposal over the past one month, tribunals in Punjab, Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) continue to lag varyingly behind those in Balochistan.
The three tribunals in Balochistan have disposed of 30 out of 51 results disputes (60 percent). In contrast, the six KP tribunals have decided only eight out of 42 petitions (19 percent), while the five Sindh tribunals have disposed of a mere 12 out of 83 petitions (14 percent).
Punjab tribunals, which faced delays in their establishment due to interpretational differences between the Lahore High Court (LHC) and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), have resolved only 10 out of 155 petitions (six percent).
Despite the notification of their establishment, four out of eight tribunals in Punjab, comprising retired judges, have yet to commence hearings.
Similarly, three pending petitions in Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) tribunal await ECP decisions on transfer applications filed by the defendants.
The majority of petitions decided thus far concern disputes over provincial assembly constituencies. Of the 51 disputes decided on provincial seats, 29 relate to the Balochistan Assembly, nine to the Sindh Assembly, seven to the Punjab Assembly and six to the KP Assembly. In comparison, only nine petitions on National Assembly (NA) constituencies have been decided, with three each in Punjab and Sindh, two in KP and one in Balochistan. Overall, 21 percent of 239 petitions on provincial constituencies have been decided so far.
On the other hand, only nine percent of 111 petitions on NA constituencies have been decided. Of 56 dismissed petitions, as many as 22 were dismissed on the grounds of non-maintainability, eight were withdrawn by the petitioners, and five were dismissed due to non-prosecution. The tribunals rejected 16 petitions following a full trial.
FAFEN has yet to ascertain the reasons for the dismissal of remaining five petitions due to unavailability of the copies of respective judgements.
The three petitions accepted by the tribunals pertain to Balochistan Assembly constituencies, where the tribunals ordered re-polling in parts of the constituencies. These constituencies include PB-44 Quetta-VII, PB-45 Quetta-VIII, and PB-36 Kalat.
Two of these accepted petitions were filed by losing candidates of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam Pakistan (JUIP) and one by a candidate from the National Party (NP) against two winners from Pakistan People’s Party Parliamentarian (PPPP), and one from the Balochistan Awami Party (BAP).
A petition on PS-97 Karachi East-I has been abated due to death of the petitioner. The abated petition was filed by the losing independent candidate, backed by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), against the returned candidate of Muttahida Qaumi Movement Pakistan (MQMP).
Among the dismissed petitions for NA and PA constituencies, 13 were filed by PPPP candidates, 10 by unaffiliated independent candidates, six by independents backed by PTI, five by JUIP, four by Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PMLN), three each by NP and Awami National Party (ANP), two each by Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan (JIP) and Pashtunkhwa Milli Awami Party (PKMAP), and one each by BAP, Balochistan National Party (BNP), Balochistan National Party Awami (BNPA), Grand Democratic Alliance (GDA), Hazara Democratic Party (HDP), Jamhoori Watan Party (JWP), Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP), and Khadameen-e-Sindh (KS).
In terms of the respondents, 14 decided petitions were filed against PMLN winners, 13 against PTI-backed independent winners, 10 against PPPP winners, six against JUIP winners, five against MQMP winners, three against unaffiliated independent returned candidates, two against NP candidates, and one each against winners from BNPA, BNP, and BAP.
Court asked appellants to satisfy it on next hearing that how decision of single bench was not right
Petitioner’s lawyer informed court that parliament had passed 26th Constitutional Amendment
CM urged people to choose between resisting oppression and embracing freedom or continuing under shackles of slavery
Committee emphasised need for effective legislation to safeguard rights of parliamentarians
Muzammil Aslam highlighted need for 5,000 watersheds in KP, requiring an investment of Rs 115 billion
Justice Shahzad observed that with support of appellant, 85% power theft was witnessed in his locality
