Saied re-elected Tunisia president with 90.7pc of the vote

TUNIS: Kais Saied has been re-elected president of Tunisia with 90.69 percent of votes cast, electoral authority ISIE said on Monday, although low turnout reflected widespread discontent in the cradle of the Arab Spring pro-democracy uprisings.

Three years after Saied made a sweeping power grab, rights groups fear his re-election will entrench his grip on the only democracy to emerge from the 2011 protests. Saied, 66, won Sunday´s vote by a landslide with 2.4 million votes -- but with turnout at only 28.8 percent of nearly 10 million eligible voters.

His imprisoned rival Ayachi Zammel received just 7.3 percent, and third candidate Zouhair Maghzaoui only 1.9 percent, ISIE head Farouk Bouasker said on national television. Critics said the low turnout reflected widespread disillusionment with the election.

On Sunday, the ISIE said just six percent of voters were aged 18-35, a category constituting a third of the initially eligible electorate. After longtime dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali was ousted in 2011, Tunisia prided itself on being the birthplace of the regional revolts against authoritarianism that became known as the Arab Spring.

But the North African country´s path changed dramatically after Saied was elected in 2019 with 73 percent of the vote. Two years later, he dissolved parliament, and later rewrote the constitution.

Sunday´s turnout was the lowest recorded in a Tunisian presidential after Ben Ali´s ouster. In 2019, 58 percent turned out to vote for Saied as president. “I didn´t vote yesterday, simply because I no longer have confidence and I am desperate,” said Houcine, 63, giving only one name for fear of retribution.

Political commentator Hatem Nafti, author of a forthcoming book on Saied´s authoritarian rule, said: “The vote´s legitimacy is undoubtedly tainted with candidates who could have overshadowed (Saied) being systematically sidelined.” On Monday, the European Union said it had “taken note” of criticisms from rights groups “concerning the integrity of the electoral process” and “various measures deemed detrimental to the democratic requirements of credibility” of the vote.