AGP points out irregularities in IHC building construction
The revised building plan has not been approved by the CDA
ISLAMABAD: Serious irregularities have been revealed in the performance audit of Islamabad High Court building constructed on Shahra-e-Dastur Islamabad. The Auditor General of Pakistan has submitted the audit report to the National Assembly Secretariat.
The building was constructed by Pak PWD. The objective of the performance audit was to examine whether the construction planning was correct or not, and whether the resources were used efficiently.
In the executive summary of the report, it is said that due to change in the scope of the project and delay in completion, the cost and duration of the project increased. The cost rose to Rs2.614 billion.
According to the report, pre-shipment inspection of imported electrical, mechanical, heating and air conditioning system was not conducted and imported with no reason. Site test and rate analysis was not done. This amount is Rs1 billion. The revised building plan has not been approved by the CDA.
The cost of changes made in terms of the contract amounts to Rs1.381 billion. The report revealed Rs1 billion were paid without creating a detailed measurement book of the construction work. The audit report recommended a fact-finding inquiry be conducted to determine the cost and duration of the project.
It is also recommended the officers and consultants of the department be held responsible for not conducting pre-shipment inspection and rate analysis of imported electrical, mechanical, heating and air-conditioning systems.
The report said revised building plan should be get approved by CDA and re-fixation of rate be carried out accurately. The officers who have not made a detailed measurement book of construction work should also be identified.
According to the report, the PC-1 of the project was approved on September 23, 2014, fixing its cost at Rs2.852 billion. But this cost increased to Rs5 billion, it said.
The cost increased by 75.88 percent. For that reason, changes were made in the design of the building, the report found. The contractor was paid Rs1 billion more on the pretended reason of increase in prices. Departmental charges of Rs2.25 billion have not been collected from the contractor, the report said.
The report said Rs115 million were paid to the contractor on unreasonable rate, and a fine of Rs113 million not imposed on consultant for defective performance.
-
Andrew, Sarah Ferguson Refuse King Charles Request: 'Raising Eyebrows Inside Palace' -
Adam Sandler Reveals How Tom Cruise Introduced Him To Paul Thomas Anderson -
Washington Post CEO William Lewis Resigns After Sweeping Layoffs -
North Korea To Hold 9th Workers’ Party Congress In Late February -
All You Need To Know Guide To Rosacea -
Princess Diana's Brother 'handed Over' Althorp House To Marion And Her Family -
Trump Mobile T1 Phone Resurfaces With New Specs, Higher Price -
Factory Explosion In North China Leaves Eight Dead -
Blac Chyna Opens Up About Her Kids: ‘Disturb Their Inner Child' -
Winter Olympics 2026: Milan Protestors Rally Against The Games As Environmentally, Economically ‘unsustainable’ -
How Long Is The Super Bowl? Average Game Time And Halftime Show Explained -
Natasha Bure Makes Stunning Confession About Her Marriage To Bradley Steven Perry -
ChatGPT Caricature Prompts Are Going Viral. Here’s List You Must Try -
James Pearce Jr. Arrested In Florida After Alleged Domestic Dispute, Falcons Respond -
Cavaliers Vs Kings: James Harden Shines Late In Cleveland Debut Win -
2026 Winter Olympics Snowboarding: Su Yiming Wins Bronze And Completes Medal Set