Higher judiciary appointments in hands of judges not willing to even talk to one another: Bilawal
He criticised PTI accusing it of engaging in opposition for the sake of opposition
KARACHI: Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said on Monday that appointments to the higher judiciary are in the hands of judges who, due to political reasons, are not even willing to communicate with one another.
He criticised the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), accusing it of engaging in opposition for the sake of opposition. He said their (PTI leaders’) aim is to see Pakistan fail, and they want to keep the country in such disarray that they can politically benefit from the situation.
The PTI, according to Bilawal, consistently tries to make every post controversial, and the attack on Justice Qazi Faez Isa did not begin today.
Speaking on Geo News programme “Aaj Shahzeb Khanzada Kay Saath,”, the PPP chairman said that before proposing constitutional amendments, there was an understanding that the government had the support of Maulana Fazlur Rehman. However, when the draft was presented before the committee, it became evident that there was a significant difference between Maulana Fazlur Rehman’s stance and the government’s position.
Addressing those who are objecting to the timing of the constitutional amendments, Bilawal questioned, “If not now, when will this work be done?” He dismissed the notion of rushing the process, asserting that those talking of haste think that they can sabotage the constitution-making process being undertaken by us.
He said that as soon as they secure a two-thirds majority, they will present the amendments to parliament, whether that is tomorrow or the day after. “The sooner we pass this piece of legislation, the better,” he added.
Bilawal also shared that they are currently in contact with Maulana Fazlur Rehman, who is in communication with the PTI. He made it clear that if PTI members contact PPP members like Khursheed Shah or Naveed Qamar in the committee formed for constitutional amendments, he would not stop them.
-
Emily Ratajkowski Appears To Confirm Romance With Dua Lipa's Ex Romain Gavras -
Leighton Meester Breaks Silence On Viral Ariana Grande Interaction On Critics Choice Awards -
Heavy Snowfall Disrupts Operations At Germany's Largest Airport -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Released Hours After Police Arrest -
Heidi Klum Eyes Spooky Season Anthem With Diplo After Being Dubbed 'Queen Of Halloween' -
King Charles Is In ‘unchartered Waters’ As Andrew Takes Family Down -
Why Prince Harry, Meghan 'immensely' Feel 'relieved' Amid Andrew's Arrest? -
Jennifer Aniston’s Boyfriend Jim Curtis Hints At Tensions At Home, Reveals Rules To Survive Fights -
Shamed Andrew ‘dismissive’ Act Towards Royal Butler Exposed -
Hailey Bieber Shares How She Protects Her Mental Health While Facing Endless Criticism -
Amanda Seyfried Shares Hilarious Reaction To Discovering Second Job On 'Housemaid': 'Didn’t Sign Up For That' -
Queen Elizabeth II Saw ‘qualities Of Future Queen’ In Kate Middleton -
Hilary Duff Reveals Deep Fear About Matthew Koma Marriage -
Will Sarah Ferguson End Up In Police Questioning After Andrew’s Arrest? Barrister Answers -
Matthew McConaughey Gets Candid About AI Threat To Actors: 'Be Prepared' -
Hailey Bieber Shares How 16-month-old Son Jack Blues Is Already Following In Justin Bieber's Footsteps