Pemra’s appeal against suspension of telecast restrictions rejected
Court was requested to set aside single bench interim order because it was issued without hearing Pemra
KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Tuesday disposed of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority’s (Pemra) appeal against the high court’s single bench interim order that suspended Pemra’s restrictions on telecasting certain political activities and speeches on the electronic media in the wake of the May 9 incidents.
An SHC division bench headed by Chief Justice Mohammad Shafi Siddiqui again referred the matter to the high court’s single bench for deciding it within six weeks.
Pemra had challenged the SHC’s single bench order in which it had suspended Pemra’s letter to media outlets about restrictions on telecasting certain political activities and speeches on the electronic media after the May 9 riots.
The court was requested to set aside the single bench interim order because it was issued without hearing Pemra. After hearing the arguments of Pemra and the defendant’s counsel, the court referred the matter to the single bench for deciding it within six weeks.
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf office-bearer Mohammad Tehamas Ali Khan had earlier challenged Pemra’s direction to satellite TV channels to not promote any hatemongers, perpetrators and their facilitators inadvertently.
Khan said that the impugned letter does not mention either a political party or its leader, and only refers to zealots, adding that Pemra has asked TV channels to ensure that hatemongers, rioters and their facilitators are completely screened out from the media.
He said that no instance had been given to TV channels as to who was to be blocked out, adding that Pemra’s order empowers them to censor the political speech of anyone disliked by the government.
He also said Pemra had bypassed the Council of Complaints by issuing this prohibition order, adding that the order was passed to control the free media, and stifle political speech and activities.
Pemra had said in its order that the events of May 9 were aimed at “weakening the federation” by promoting anti-state sentiments. It said TV channels should refrain from providing airtime to individuals who propagate hate speech and provoke public sentiments against the federation and state institutions.
-
Bridgerton’s Michelle Mao On Facing Backlash As Season Four Antagonist -
King Charles Gets New ‘secret Weapon’ After Andrew Messes Up -
Shia LaBeouf Makes Bold Claim About Homosexuals In First Interview After Mardi Gras Arrest -
Princess Beatrice, Eugenie ‘strained’ As They Are ‘not Turning Back’ On Andrew -
Benny Blanco Addresses ‘dirty Feet’ Backlash After Podcast Moment Sparks Online Frenzy -
Sarah Ferguson Unusual Trait That Confused Royal Expert -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Left Sarah Ferguson Feeling 'worthless' -
Ben Affleck Focused On 'real Prize,' Stability After Jennifer Garner Speaks About Co Parenting Mechanics -
Luke Grimes Reveals Hilarious Reason His Baby Can't Stop Laughing At Him -
Why Kate Middleton, Prince William Opt For ‘show Stopping Style’ -
Here's Why Leonardo DiCaprio Will Not Attend This Year's 'Actors Award' Despite Major Nomination -
Ethan Hawke Reflects On Hollywood Success As Fifth Oscar Nomination Arrives -
Tom Cruise Feeling Down In The Dumps Post A Series Of Failed Romances: Report -
'The Pitt' Producer Reveals Why He Was Nervous For The New Ep Of Season Two -
Maggie Gyllenhaal Gets Honest About Being Jealous Of Jake Gyllenhaal -
'Bridgerton' Star Luke Thompson Gets Honest About Season Five