Islamabad: Health advocates expressed deep concern over the government's decision to maintain current cigarette tax rates in the federal budget 2024-25. A session organised by the Society for the Protection of the Rights of the Child (SPARC) and the Social Policy and Development Centre (SPDC) highlighted the negative implications for public health and revenue generation.
Chief guest Murtaza Solangi, Former Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting, stated, "The federal budget 2024-25 missed a critical opportunity to generate substantial revenue through increased cigarette taxes. This revenue could have been invested in public health, easing the economic burden on our healthcare system. Instead, maintaining current tax rates benefits cigarette manufacturers without additional excise tax contributions, undermining tobacco control efforts and worsening the public health crisis caused by tobacco use.
He further added that we must advocate for policies that prioritise public health and urge the government to implement measures that balance revenue generation with health objectives."
Managing Director of SPDC, Muhammad Asif Iqbal, said, "The government's decision to spare the cigarette industry from any tax hike, despite the need to generate additional revenue to address the fiscal deficit, is concerning. He said the FED revenue target of Rs324 billion for 2024-25 from Cigarette industry is unrealistically high without an increase taxes on cigarette sector, and even with estimates suggesting a shortfall of over Rs100 billion. The Finance Act 2024’s changes benefit cigarette manufacturers by allowing price increases without additional excise tax revenue. The government should adopt a dual approach of increasing the FED rate and implementing regulations to combat the illegal cigarette trade. Effective tobacco control policies should leverage higher cigarette taxes as a tool to discourage tobacco use and promote public health." Renowned tobacco control activist Malik Imran Ahmed, Country Head Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids added, the increase in the FED price tier thresholds benefit the cigarette manufacturing firms, allowing them to increase consumer prices without any additional contribution to excise tax revenue. This approach not only undermines our efforts towards tobacco control but also risks exacerbating the public health crisis caused by tobacco consumption.
Dr. Khalil Ahmad, programme manager SPARC said, while the Finance Bill's provision may enhance profitability within the tobacco industry, its implications for public health and fiscal policy are significant and contentious. The debate underscores the delicate balance governments must strike between economic interests, public health priorities to save Pakistani children and youth from addiction and disease and sustainable fiscal management.
The decision has raised alarms among healthcare advocates and the general public alike, who fear its long-term ramifications on public health and economic stability. As discussions on the Finance Bill progress, stakeholders continue to call for a reconsideration of policies that prioritise short-term industry gains over the broader public interest.
Court asked appellants to satisfy it on next hearing that how decision of single bench was not right
Petitioner’s lawyer informed court that parliament had passed 26th Constitutional Amendment
CM urged people to choose between resisting oppression and embracing freedom or continuing under shackles of slavery
Committee emphasised need for effective legislation to safeguard rights of parliamentarians
Muzammil Aslam highlighted need for 5,000 watersheds in KP, requiring an investment of Rs 115 billion
Justice Shahzad observed that with support of appellant, 85% power theft was witnessed in his locality
