No leniency for those releasing girls’ private photos: IHC
The court termed the sharing of private pictures a very heinous crime
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday observed that the people accused of sharing objectionable pictures of women with others and similar offences do not deserve any leniency.
The remark came during the hearing of a plea seeking bail of a man, Muhammad Haseeb, who is accused of sharing objectionable pictures of a girl on social media site Facebook and her father and husband on WhatsApp.
The court rejected the bail plea, stating that such offences have become very common in The court termed the sharing of private pictures a very heinous crime.society for the reason that girls send “their objectionable pictures” to boys or friends when in a relationship, which are later shared on social platforms in case of a breakup.
The court termed the sharing of private pictures a very heinous crime.
“[…] as these pictures become stigma throughout the life of girls and in many cases their family life has destroyed; the girls have also committed suicide, hence the accused committing such offences are not entitled for any leniency,” the court stated in a written order.
The case against Haseeb was registered at the Federal Investigation Agency’s (FIA) Cybercrime Reporting Centre, Islamabad, under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016, alleging that the accused “disgraced and destroyed the modesty” of the complainant by unauthorisedly capturing or recording her objectionable pictures and publicly projecting them and sharing with her family members.
“The petitioner has committed a heinous crime by sending the sexually explicit pictures of the complainant to her father, husband, friends etc. as well as by posting the same on the […] Facebook; FIA collected sufficient incriminating evidence against him. Technical analysis expert report is available on record which shows that the petitioner has committed aforementioned crime,” the order stated.
It further stated that the petitioner’s request for bail has been rejected but it is a “tentative assessment” which will not affect the case’s trial.
-
Winter Olympics 2026: Top Contenders Poised To Win Gold In Women’s Figure Skating -
Inside The Moment King Charles Put Prince William In His Place For Speaking Against Andrew -
Will AI Take Your Job After Graduation? Here’s What Research Really Says -
California Cop Accused Of Using Bogus 911 Calls To Reach Ex-partner -
AI Film School Trains Hollywood's Next Generation Of Filmmakers -
Royal Expert Claims Meghan Markle Is 'running Out Of Friends' -
Bruno Mars' Valentine's Day Surprise Labelled 'classy Promo Move' -
Ed Sheeran Shares His Trick Of Turning Bad Memories Into Happy Ones -
Teyana Taylor Reflects On Her Friendship With Julia Roberts -
Bright Green Comet C/2024 E1 Nears Closest Approach Before Leaving Solar System -
Meghan Markle Warns Prince Harry As Royal Family Lands In 'biggest Crises' Since Death Of Princess Diana -
Elon Musk Weighs Parenthood Against AI Boom, Sparking Public Debate -
'Elderly' Nanny Arrested By ICE Outside Employer's Home, Freed After Judge's Order -
Keke Palmer On Managing Growing Career With 2-year-old Son: 'It's A Lot' -
Key Details From Germany's Multimillion-euro Heist Revealed -
David E. Kelley Breaks Vow To Cast Wife Michelle Pfeiffer In 'Margo's Got Money Troubles'