close
Saturday November 23, 2024

What are legal remedies for election irregularities?

Mehrbano Qureshi, an independent candidate from Multan while expressing her concerns over the election result

By Fakhar Durrani
February 10, 2024
Meher Bano, daughter of former foreign minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Vice Chairman Shah Mehmood Qureshi, talks to the media outside the Supreme Court on Dec 23, 2023, in this still taken from a video. — Facebook/PTI
Meher Bano, daughter of former foreign minister and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Vice Chairman Shah Mehmood Qureshi, talks to the media outside the Supreme Court on Dec 23, 2023, in this still taken from a video. — Facebook/PTI

ISLAMABAD: What are the legal remedies and how much time does it take to redress the grievances? This question has emerged after some independent candidates from Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), who have lost in the general elections 2024, have leveled rigging allegations.

Mehrbano Qureshi, an independent candidate from Multan while expressing her concerns over the election result, claimed that more than 16,000 votes have been rejected in her constituency. Whereas, she claimed she was not allowed to enter the premises of returning officer at the time of compilation of Form 47.

The question here arises under what law such election irregularities can be challenged and how much time it takes to get relief. The aggrieved candidate can file a petition in the Election Tribunal under Section 139 and 142 if he/she believes the election was conducted unfairly, illegally or in violation of electoral laws. However, the petition must be filed within 45 days of the publication of election result.

Before filing the petition, the applicant must gather evidence to support the allegations. The evidence can be video clips, witness statements or any other documents. Although, some PTI candidates have leveled rigging and irregularities allegations, the question arises whether they have any evidence for these claims. Whether they have any documentary or any other evidence to prove their claims under Election Act 2017. Has any such evidence been presented in the media so far?

Under Section 144 of the Election Act 2017, the complainant must present a statement of fact and other material evidence to prove the alleged irregularities in the election.

The election tribunals, after concluding the hearing, can declare the election null and void, order a re-election or declare the petitioner as the winner of the election under Section 154 of the Election Act 2017.

In the recent past, the election tribunal declared former Deputy Speaker National Assembly Qasim Suri’s election null and void and ordered re-election in NA-265 Quetta on September 27, 2019. Qasim Suri had won the seat from his opponent Nawabzada Lashakri Raisani.

Raisani then challenged it in the election tribunal on the grounds of rejection of 52,000 votes. It is important to note here that Qasim Suri won the seat by over 5,000 votes as he bagged 25,973 votes from NA-265 whereas his opponent Lashkari Raisani got 20,089 votes.

The election tribunal concluded the petition within two months. It is worth mentioning that the General Elections 2018 were held on July 25 and the tribunal gave its verdict after almost 14 months. However, Suri challenged the election tribunal result in the Supreme Court, which issued a stay order and issued a restraining order to the Election Commission of Pakistan from issuing re-election schedules in the constituency.