JI moves SC against increase in power tariff
JI Ameer Sirajul Haq filed a petition in SC under Article 184(3) of Constitution through his counsel Qaiser Imam
ISLAMABAD: The Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) Thursday moved the Supreme Court against “unjustified increase in electricity tariff by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority and imposition of surcharges, taxes and fee in the power bill by the government”.
JI Ameer Sirajul Haq filed a petition in the apex court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution through his counsel Qaiser Imam, making the Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Power Division, Ministry of Energy, NEPRA, Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) through its chairman and others as respondents.
The JI questioned as to whether the recent increase in electricity bills by way of levying fuel price adjustments, surcharges, taxes and tariff adjustment in the monthly electricity bills were violative of fundamental rights of citizens of Pakistan, enshrined under articles 3, 4, 9 and 25 of the Constitution.
The petition asked if the Federation of Pakistan and Ministry of Energy had not failed to perform their constitutional duties. It further asked whether NEPRA had not failed to perform its functions, being the sole regulator of power sector in Pakistan. It stated that while determining the tariff it violated Section 31(2)(a) of the NEPRA Act, which cast a duty upon NEPRA to protect its consumers against monopolistic and oligopolistic prices.
The JI submitted that in the month of August, 2023, the entire nation was shocked after receiving their monthly electricity bills, which were unrealistically higher than usual, adding that the people of Pakistan, who were facing unstable political government and serious economic instability, had reached at the verge of committing suicides after receiving their monthly electricity bills.
The JI Ameer submitted that the nationwide protests and rallies were evident of the fact that the people of the country were crying out loud for help but, unfortunately, the federal government and the power sector of the country were not paying any heed to their miseries.
The JI contended that it was time to bring the power sector of the country to the book, as neither the federal government nor the regulator NEPRA was taking concrete steps to regulate the electricity sector.
The JI submitted that non-supply of cheap and cost-effective electricity was violative of Article 9 of the Constitution.
-
Why Prince William Releases Statement On Epstein Scandal Amid Most 'challenging' Diplomatic Trip? -
Historic Mental Health Facility Closes Its Doors -
Top 5 Easy Hair Fall Remedies For The Winter -
Japan Elections: Stock Surges Record High As PM Sanae Takaichi Secures Historic Victory -
Prince William, Kate Middleton Finally Address Epstein Scandal For First Time: 'Deeply Concerned' -
Kim Kardashian Promised THIS To Lewis Hamilton At The 2026 Super Bowl? -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Throws King Charles A Diplomatic Crisis -
Barack Obama Hails Seahawks Super Bowl Win, Calls Defense ‘special’ -
Pregnant Women With Depression Likely To Have Kids With Autism -
$44B Sent By Mistake: South Korea Demands Tougher Crypto Regulations -
Lady Gaga Makes Surprising Cameo During Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance -
Paul Brothers Clash Over Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance -
South Korea: Two Killed As Military Helicopter Crashes During Training -
Elon Musk Unveils SpaceX’s Moon-first Strategy With ‘self Growing Lunar City’ -
Donald Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Super Bowl Performance: 'Absolutely Terrible' -
Jake Paul Criticizes Bad Bunny's Super Bowl LX Halftime Show: 'Fake American'