SC defers pleas against law clipping CJP powers
The bench could not proceed due to the non-availability of one of the bench members, court staff said
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) has postponed for date-in-office (indefinite period of time) the hearing of petitions challenging the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023 due to the non-availability of one of the bench members. An eight-member bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice Umer Bandial, was scheduled to resume hearing the petitions on Thursday. However, the court staff informed the media that the bench could not proceed due to the non-availability of one of the bench members. The staff asked the Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP), as well as counsel for the petitioners, to meet CJP Bandial in the meeting room. Other members of the bench included Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Muneeb Akhtar, Justice Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Ayesha Malik, Justice Hasan Azhar Rizvi and Justice Shahid Waheed.
Meanwhile, it was learnt AGP Mansoor Usman Awan informed the chief justice that no immediate legislation could be passed to reconcile the two laws since parliament was engaged in the budget session. The AGP requested the court to hear the case after the budget session. Later, the matter was postponed for an indefinite time period. On the last hearing, the AGP had told the court that the government had enacted two laws, the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act 2023 and the Supreme Court (Review of Judgments and Orders) Act 2023. He submitted that both the laws had similarities in sections of review and hiring a lawyer. The court had suspended the bill before it was enacted. However, on April 21, the bill became a law, though its implementation was halted by the court.
-
Northern Lights: Calm Conditions Persist Amid Low Space Weather Activity -
'Look What Andrew Has Done': Meghan Markle Defended On Jeremy Vine Show -
Apple, Google Agree To Make 'app Store' Changes Over UK Regulator Concerns -
Autodesk Files Lawsuit Against Google Over AI Video Tool Trademark Dispute -
San Francisco 49ers Player Shot Near Post-Super Bowl Party -
Kardashian-Jenner Clan Brings Lewis Hamilton Into The Fold: Watch -
Meghan Markle 'quietly Dreaded' As Ex-best Friend Receives Lucrative Offer For Bombshell Memoir About Duchess -
Blake Shelton, Gwen Stefani Make Big Move To Save Their Marriage -
Google Warns Of State-sponsored Cyberattacks Targeting Defense Sector Employees -
Ransom Deadline Passes: FBI Confirms ‘communication Blackout’ In Nancy Guthrie Abduction -
Jeff Bezos Hints At Blue Origin Moon Plans As Elon Musk Responds With Cautious Praise -
Zach Bryan Slams Turning Point USA Alternative Halftime Show: 'Embarrassing As Hell' -
South Korea Blames Coupang Data Breach On 'management Failures,' Not Cyber Attack -
‘Disgraced’ Andrew More Concerned About ‘issue Of His Legacy’ Than Epstein Links -
Instagram Plans New Snapchat-style App ‘Instants’ Amid Rising AR Competition -
Safer Internet Day 2026: Is Social Media Ban The Only Way To Protect Kids?