close
Thursday November 28, 2024

Petitions for ‘Cipher’ probe: SC hears pleas against registrar objections tomorrow

Justice Qazi Faez Isa will hear the appeals in the chamber

By Sohail Khan
February 21, 2023
The Supreme Court building in Islamabad. The SCP website
The Supreme Court building in Islamabad. The SCP website

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan has fixed February 22 (tomorrow) for hearing identical chamber appeals filed against the Registrar's Office's objections to constitutional petitions, seeking the formation of a commission to probe the alleged foreign conspiracy to topple the government of former Prime Minister Imran Khan.

Justice Qazi Faez Isa, senior judge of the Supreme Court, will hear the appeals in the chamber on February 22. On January 24, Justice Sardar Tariq Massod recused himself from hearing the identical appeals against the objections. The judge had forwarded the appeals to Chief Justice Umer Ata Bandial for fixing them before another judge. Advocates Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta, Naeemul Hassan and Tariq Badar had filed petitions in the court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, making the federation of Pakistan through the secretary of law and justice, the Prime Minister and the cabinet secretary as respondents.

They had prayed the court to constitute a commission to investigate the “international conspiracy” that former Prime Minister Imran Khan had alleged was hatched to topple his government.

The registrar's office, however, had returned the petitions with objections that they did not point out what questions of public importance were involved with reference to the enforcement of any of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution, so as to directly invoke the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution.

It was further objected that the ingredients for invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of the court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution had not been satisfied. It objected that the petitioners had not approached any other appropriate forum, available under the law for relief and also did not provide any justification for not doing so.