Religious leaders show mixed reaction to blasphemy law amendment
LAHORE: Religious leaders belonging to Sunni and Ahle Hadith schools of thought lauded the passage of the legislation enhancing the punishment for desecration of Sahaba (RA), Ummahatul Momeneen (RA) and Ahle Bait (RA), terming it a big step towards controlling sectarian conflicts, while those of Shia school of thought rejected it as imposing the will of majority.
President of Islami Jamhoori Ittehad (IJI) Allama Zubair Ahmad Zaheer praised the members of National Assembly for passing a historic legislation upholding the honour of the Muslim sacred personalities and block the doors of incitements for igniting the sectarian strife, which has been plaguing the country for over four decades.
Addressing a meeting along with party leaders Prof Adnan Faisal, Mian M Asghar and others, Allama Zaheer, who is also ameer of his faction of Jamiat Ahle Hadith, paid tributes to Maulana Abdul Akbar Chitrali and other MNAs for doing a great service by tabling this vital law to strengthen national unity and close the doors of sectarianism and corruption at the behest of external forces. He demanded government to implement this law immediately and indiscriminately.
Jamiat Ulema-e-Pakistan (JUP) supreme council chairman Qari Zawwar Bahadur and information secretary Rasheed Rizvi termed it historic legislation which is vitally important to shut the doors of sectarianism and establish religious peace in the country.
They said upholding the honour of sacred Muslim figures is essential pillar of Muslim faith and those miscreants violating it must be punished to maintain sectarian harmony in the society. On the other hand, spokesperson of Tehrik Jafaria Pakistan Allama Sajid Ali Naqvi, in a statement, rejected the law by amending section 298 A CrPC terming it imposing of the will of majority on others.
He said without first defining the terms insult, blasphemy and their scope and restrictions any legislation would amount to imposing one-sided and biased views of majority on the people. Terming the legislation controversial, the spokesperson said it will prove extremely
dangerous for the internal security and harmony and it can lead to unrest,
chaos and division in the society.
-
EU Leaders Divided Over ‘Buy European’ Push At Belgium Summit: How Will It Shape Europe's Volatile Economy? -
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle Issue A Statement Two Days After King Charles -
'The Masked Singer' Pays Homage To James Van Der Beek After His Death -
Elon Musk’s XAI Shake-up Amid Co-founders’ Departure: What’s Next For AI Venture? -
Prince William, King Charles Are Becoming Accessories To Andrew’s Crimes? Expert Explains Legality -
Seedance 2.0: How It Redefines The Future Of AI Sector -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Still Has A Loan To Pay Back: Heres Everything To Know -
US House Passes ‘SAVE America Act’: Key Benefits, Risks & Voter Impact Explained -
'Heartbroken' Busy Philipps Mourns Death Of Her Friend James Van Der Beek -
Gwyneth Paltrow Discusses ‘bizarre’ Ways Of Dealing With Chronic Illness -
US House Passes Resolution To Rescind Trump’s Tariffs On Canada -
Reese Witherspoon Pays Tribute To James Van Der Beek After His Death -
Halsey Explains ‘bittersweet’ Endometriosis Diagnosis -
'Single' Zayn Malik Shares Whether He Wants More Kids -
James Van Der Beek’s Family Faces Crisis After His Death -
Courteney Cox Celebrates Jennifer Aniston’s 57th Birthday With ‘Friends’ Throwback