ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday clubbed the identical petitions with regard to the local body elections in the Federal Capital and served notices to the respondents for Friday.
Chief Justice Aamer Farooq heard the petitions about the increase in the number of Union Councils (UCs), changes in voter lists and postponing the LG elections. At the outset, Attorney General for Pakistan Ashtar Ausaf Ali argued that the petitioner had not challenged the notification regarding the increase in the number of UCs. Director General Election Commission of Pakistan told the court that a new notification had been issued related to the UCs and the ECP had also issued the order on it, stating that the local body election in the Federal Capital would be taken place as per its schedule. Chief Justice asked the PTI’s lawyer how it was contempt of court as the elections were taking place in the capital. “How the court should stop the Parliament from legislation?” he questioned. The chief justice said that since other identical petitions had also been filed, the court had decided to club them.
Justice Aamer Farooq asked that when the federal cabinet had granted approval for the increase in the number of UCs then why the petition was filed only against the Prime Minister? The court said it hoped that if there was any issue, then government and ECP would address it. The court, however, said that the petition related to changes in the voter lists was more important.
Advocate General Jahangir Jadoon also challenged the decision of ECP for rejecting the federal government’s notification. The court served notices to ECP and other respondents for Friday and adjourned the hearing of the case.
Court asked appellants to satisfy it on next hearing that how decision of single bench was not right
Petitioner’s lawyer informed court that parliament had passed 26th Constitutional Amendment
CM urged people to choose between resisting oppression and embracing freedom or continuing under shackles of slavery
Committee emphasised need for effective legislation to safeguard rights of parliamentarians
Muzammil Aslam highlighted need for 5,000 watersheds in KP, requiring an investment of Rs 115 billion
Justice Shahzad observed that with support of appellant, 85% power theft was witnessed in his locality